Search for: "State v House"
Results 8221 - 8240
of 28,334
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2017, 9:05 pm
Eric Claeys (George Mason/Scalia) on Penn Central v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 8:08 am
Bush, and counsel for the plaintiffs in State National Bank of Big Spring v. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 9:28 am
” In White v. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 5:33 am
More specifically, in the Land Court case of, US Bank National Association v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 3:46 am
” Nicholas Stephanopolous writes at the Election Law Blog that last week’s ruling by a federal court in Michigan “that twenty-seven Michigan state house, state senate, and congressional districts are unconstitutional partisan gerrymanders” reveals that “while the Supreme Court continues to debate the issue” in this term’s two partisan-gerrymandering cases, Rucho v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:11 am
L. v the United Kingdom here. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:11 am
L. v the United Kingdom here. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 1:27 pm
On September 24, 2013, SAP Retail Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 9:06 am
What a great title for a symposium: "A Vain and Idle Enactment: Could McDonald v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 8:41 am
Wolf gives any evidence of having read, even while stating my opinions for me), and I did not conflate them in my interview with Ms. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 6:20 am
A large majority of House Republicans agreed. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 5:30 am
King v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:41 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Hosanna-Tabor Church v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 3:53 am
In Epps v. [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 10:10 pm
Barnabei v Chadds Ford Township, 2015 WL 5025456 (ED PA 8/24/2015)Filed under: ADA, Current Caselaw, Fair Housing Act Amendments, Ripeness [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 11:07 am
Supreme Court also recently discussed the fiduciary exception and its rationale in the context of ERISA matters in a recent non-ERISA decision, United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 1:48 pm
The reinstatement of the proposed rule is in response to Tuscon Herpetological Society v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 5:33 pm
It's to be expected, especially since we sort of did it ourselves, but folks with irons in the fire are positioning themselves in advance of next Monday's oral argument in Wyeth v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 4:09 am
On 2 April, a nursing entry stated ‘Nil further chest pain’. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:26 am
This is only the second time that the highest court has considered the application of the “responsible publication in the public interest”, first established by the House of Lords in Reynolds v Times Newspapers ([2001] 2 AC 127) nearly 12 years ago. [read post]
