Search for: "State v. C. S."
Results 8221 - 8240
of 37,709
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2019, 9:43 am
§ 841(b)(1)(C).The Court also concluded that the District Court properly rejected Wiseman's request for a justification instruction. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 7:49 am
Citing language from the obstruction of justice provision, USSG § 2J1.2, dicta in its prior decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 6:14 pm
Burchi, and James V. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 11:18 am
Mr Justice Arnold found that Conversant's patent is essential and infringed by Huawei and ZTE, but invalid for added matter: Conversant v Huawei [2019] EWHC 1687 (Pat).Katfriend D. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 9:59 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 9:08 am
New Pass-Through Rules Impacting the Federal SALT Deduction Cap Act 442 allows an S corporation or any entity taxed as a partnership for federal income tax purposes to elect to be taxed as a C corporation for Louisiana income tax. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 6:42 pm
State v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 1:38 pm
By Jessica C. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 12:46 pm
The government refuses to recognize Jonathan and Derek's marriage and all of Simone's rights as a U.S. citizen," Aaron C. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 7:58 am
A Flawed Legal Approach To Middle East PeaceAnja Matwijkiw & Bronik Matwijkiw, Illiberal versus Liberal State Branding and Public International Law: Denmark and the Approximation to Human(itarian) RightlessnessOreste Pollicino & Giovanni De Gregorio, A Constitutional-Driven Change of Heart ISP Liability, AI and the Digital Single Market Forum - Jurisprudential Cross-Fertilization: An Annual Overview Antônio Augusto Cançado Trindade, The Continuity of… [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 7:56 am
In Rehaif v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 10:25 am
See United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 10:10 am
See United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 9:46 am
Shapiro v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 9:46 am
Shapiro v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 9:28 am
In The Patissier LLP v Aalst Chocolate Pte Ltd [2019] SGIPOS 10, the Applicant (The Patissier LLP) sought to revoke the mark(“Subject Mark”) registered in the name Aalst Chocolate Pte Ltd, on the ground of non-use under S 22(1)(a) and (b) of Singapore’s Trade Marks Act (“TMA”). [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 2:55 pm
(c) It is the intent of the legislature to provide for and confer comprehensive powers for the purposes stated herein. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 2:55 pm
(c) It is the intent of the legislature to provide for and confer comprehensive powers for the purposes stated herein. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 8:07 am
These are the first decisions in a wave of closely watched litigation challenges in California following the California Supreme Court’s August 2017 opinion in Cannabis Coalition v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
United States. [read post]
