Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 8221 - 8240 of 9,094
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2009, 11:14 pm
  The court  thus upholds both district judges' rulings -- one in the Bay State (First Circuit) and the other in the Old Line State (Fourth) -- on whether a men's clothing maker's secret  critic  could keep her/its/his name out of the lawsuit. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 12:10 pm
First, the district court must determine whether a case is exceptional, a factual determination reviewed for clear error. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 4:18 am
The court summed up its decision by stating that, “[i]n short, application of the first-to-file rule will promote the interest of judicial economy and avoid the possibility of conflicting judgments. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:31 am
  The Fourth District stated:  "[s]ection [733.106]does not give the trial court unbridled discretion to award fees from any part of the estate. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 11:29 am by Mark Ashton
 Each state and the District of Columbia have both federal courts and state courts. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 11:24 pm
Barr convinced the district court to find Bayer's patented compound, via 6,787,531, obvious. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 5:21 pm
Supreme Court said in McCleskey v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 3:47 am
You’ll remember that after the Supreme Court’s decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 3:35 am
That the Court would consider reversing a key portion of its decision in McConnell v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
(The Prior Art) Suggestions for fixing the US patent system (IP Watchdog) Obscure patent: Scriptured outdoor furniture (IP Watchdog) Published applications as prior art (Patently-O) Requester success rates in inter partes re-examination (Patently-O) Innovation Alliance video (Patently-O) Question on dedication of material (Patently-O) Bilski case: Financial services, patent experts seek more certainty on business-method patents (Intellectual Property Watch)   US Patents –… [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 9:10 pm
On July 30, 2009, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled against convicted peace protestors in Tataz, et al. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 3:00 am
First, the court pointed out that a court finds waiver “when the party seeking arbitration substantially invokes the judicial process to the detriment or prejudice of the other party. [read post]