Search for: "State v. House" Results 8221 - 8240 of 28,802
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2017, 1:47 pm
He contends that he stated the gist of a meritorious claim that his appellate counsel was ineffective for not arguing that the State knowingly used false or misleading testimony to obtain the indictment. . . .People v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
Maybe paternalistic central planning cannot tolerate parallel state law efforts to restore state lands. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 4:38 pm by NL
Also differences based on housing status has been held to be within Art 14 (Larkos v Cyprus 30 EHRR 597, R (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2009] 1 AC 311).If the arguments were right, it would affect many provisions of the Housing Acts and Rent Acts. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 1:15 pm
As we argued in our friend-of-the-court brief in the case, Trinity Lutheran v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 7:15 am by John Jascob
The group said its members would bear the adverse consequences of striking the preemption provision, a result sought by the states of Montana and Massachusetts in their suit against the SEC (Lindeen v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 1:15 pm
He stated that if his request were denied, he would seek to waive counsel and represent himself. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 10:57 am
White, she re-ups the lease, and then she says she wants to leave early because she's bought a house, and he says, fine, though you'll still owe four months of rent if I'm not able to find someone to rent the place. [read post]
25 May 2022, 6:59 am by CMS
  In coming to this conclusion, the Inner House stated that the Upper Tribunal had not been entitled to overturn the FTT’s finding of fact that the new information that had come into HMRC’s possession in August 2005 related to both overstated input tax and understated output tax, rather than just to overstated input tax. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat and Dennis Aftergut
” It was good enough for “separate but equal” segregation in many states up to the Court’s 1954 decision in Brown v. [read post]