Search for: "State v. So"
Results 8221 - 8240
of 117,825
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2023, 12:00 pm
As with so many other flourishing areas of software, patents don’t push forward the state of the art—they drag it down. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 11:26 am
’ The article suggests that, post-Brexit, the UK is less able to forge international agreements relating to the transfer of personal data, as countries are more reluctant to negotiate with the UK, if doing so would prejudice their negotiations with the EU. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 7:57 am
I described then the legal landscape in which their motions to transfer venue are playing out, which is largely set by the District of Columbia Circuit’s binding, en banc 1976 ruling in United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 7:56 am
The Court did not hold in Armstrong v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 6:58 am
City of San Diego, 450 U.S. 621, 654 (1981); United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 6:28 am
But in this case the Second Circuit reverses because the judge did not ask questions that would determine if potential jurors held any preconcieved notions about criminal gangs.The case is United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 6:02 am
In State v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 5:01 am
These include plots in EU member states like Cyprus, Denmark, France, Germany, and the Netherlands. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 4:52 am
The prevailing state of the law remains unsettled, with no explicit appeals court guidance to be found. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 2:46 am
The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Gonzalez v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 1:45 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 03/02/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 R (on the application of VIP… [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 1:32 am
Background In Fedotova and Others v Russia [2023] ECHR 55, the six applicants formed three same-sex couples: two female and one male. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 12:00 am
United States, — F.4th —- (9th Cir. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 10:42 pm
United States and Riley v. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 6:43 pm
Maxwell 1Bates v. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 11:16 am
People v. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 7:55 am
In the case of Kudrocova v. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
So, here we go! [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:58 am
I.M. v. [read post]
