Search for: "United States v. Close"
Results 8221 - 8240
of 14,200
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2014, 3:07 am
Jernagin v. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 9:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 1:42 pm
The Supreme Court has expressed concerns how the facial challenge might be used to undermine the legislative process, and accordingly, the challenging party is held to a higher standard of proof: To succeed in a typical facial attack, [the respondent] would have to establish “that no set of circumstances exists under which [the statute] would be valid”, United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 10:14 am
United States, 581 F.2d 575 (6th Cir. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 7:00 am
He specifically addressed our ability to address the two major strategic threats facing the United States: a rising China and weak, malevolent states. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 6:22 am
Low Testosterone Lawyers have filed the following Androgel lawsuit in Illinois: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOISEASTERN DIVISION______________________________Richard C. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 4:34 am
In the defamation case, Mann v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 7:21 pm
In Nexans Inc. et al. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 3:51 pm
Antitrust doctrine in the United States and throughout the world is constantly adjusting to both economic and academic developments. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 12:04 pm
The United States Attorney’s Office also stated that it planned to 'use the video of the [en banc] argument as a training tool to reinforce the principle that all Assistant U.S. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 11:11 am
In Employment Division v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:50 am
The United States Attorney General notoriously failed to defend the anti-Miranda statute in the Dickerson case back in 1999. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 8:02 am
In 2002, in Atkins v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 5:45 am
In McKinney v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm
Handing class-action lawyers a break, the Court denied cert. without comment in the closely watched “smelly washing machine” cases BSH Home Appliances Corp. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 11:49 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 10:10 am
How the volitional conduct test operates in the cloud is demonstrated in the Hotfile case, where the district court stated: Thus, the law is clear that Hotfile and [the owner] are not liable for direct copyright infringement because they own and manage internet facilities that allow others to upload and download copyrighted material. . . . [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:53 am
Yesterday, in Kaley v. [read post]
[Ilya Somin] Implications of alternative rationales for striking down laws banning same-sex marriage
27 Feb 2014, 8:15 am
This would build on the reasoning of the Supreme Court’s decision striking down part of the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 8:00 am
United States, 993 F.2d 211, 213 (11th Cir. 1993) (“[I]n order to recover damages under the Jones Act, [a plaintiff] must have the status of a seaman. [read post]
