Search for: "United States v. Justice"
Results 8221 - 8240
of 32,498
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2019, 9:17 am
Both place their faith in the state, and in the community, to be sure. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 6:30 am
United States, where it rejected Congress’s attempt to force the states to choose between conforming to federal radioactive waste regulations or take title to the waste, Justice Scalia stated: "The Federal Government may not compel the States to enact or administer a federal regulatory program. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:38 pm
Brief for United States 47–48. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 11:33 am
United States (Jan. 14) Romag Fasteners v. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
Andrew Pincus, amicus for the Chamber of Commerce of the United States, finished up Respondent’s argument by first addressing Justice Liu’s question regarding a modified Gentry rule. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 10:28 am
United States, 553 U.S. 137, 128 S. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 5:38 pm
The focus on and anxiety about (purposeful) shaming takes particular effect in a now well-known case, United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 4:45 pm
The centerpiece of the legal issue is Justice Scalia’s opinion in District of Columbia v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 7:00 am
United States, in which the Court limited the scope of the “honest services” statute, is in the news again. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 1:14 pm
See United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:33 am
United States remains good law. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 11:50 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 1:29 pm
The United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership, Case No. 10-290, a case that calls into question what the proper burden of proof is to invalidate a patent claim. [read post]
26 May 2017, 3:21 pm
The press had celebrated one case, Mills v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 12:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 12:28 pm
The United States Attorney's Office will often take the following position:Please be advised that in seeking records or testimony of a Department of Justice employee in any case (state or federal) in which the United States is not a party, you must comply with the Touhy regulations pertaining to the Department of Justice. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:49 pm
Federalism by Jury in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
The (in)famous Bush v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 3:30 am
United States, there are many reasons to reject the past and leave it behind. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 8:12 am
A. et al. v. [read post]
