Search for: "United States v. Justice"
Results 8221 - 8240
of 32,498
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2019, 1:07 pm
The following speakers have already committed to speak at the conference: ▪ Eyal Benvenisti, University of Cambridge ▪ Heike Krieger, Freie Universität Berlin ▪ Silja Vöneky, University of Freiburg Call for papers: We now call upon scholars to consider contributing a paper to the conference. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 11:31 am
In the United States, all MLAT requests are reviewed by the Criminal Division of the Justice Department and the U.S. attorney in the district where the witness is located; the U.S. attorney then must request a warrant or court order from a federal judge. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 6:54 am
In Barton, the Supreme Court is examining once again the stop-time rule – the same provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act that the justices dissected in Pereira v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
Just one week before, however, we had discussed Rescuecom v Google (...), a case where the United Stated Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit come to the opposite conclusion on the exact same facts. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
Buckley and Citizens United were well covered; a few added McConnell v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:54 am
If given a choice between capital punishment as practiced in the United States and no capital punishment, the queasy moderates might choose no capital punishment. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 6:43 pm
Eady v. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 1:00 pm
Also on the panel were Justice Robert Mullen, Maine State Police Trooper Seth Allen, Assistant D.A. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 3:38 pm
Having unsuccessfully lobbied Congress for two years to acquire funding for the wall along the southern border, President Donald Trump invoked the NEA earlier this year and declared a state of national emergency to divert billions of dollars of appropriated federal funds to build a wall along the United States/Mexico border. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 11:48 am
Howard: "Being completely non-technical it relates to the same invention, but the fact that it relates to the same invention does not lead to the conclusion that the patent of that invention in the United Kingdom and the United States and Germany and China is valid. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
United States, 485 F.2d 1087, 1097 (8th Cir. 1973) (voiding as vague statute punishing "libelous, scurrilous, defamatory words" written on the outside of an envelope"). [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 9:01 am
United States and Abrams v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:52 am
When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no person shall be convicted without the concurrence of two thirds of the members present. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
His discussion of NAACP v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
Justice Blackmun did not manage to erase the statutes, which still reside in the South Texas College of Law Library. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 12:00 am
United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926). [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:57 am
David Lametti, as he then was before he became an MP and later Minister of Justice, has now explicitly revived the question of whether the Board even has the jurisdiction to issue decisions that are so retroactive in their effect.Why “Dysfunctional”? [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:47 am
"Huawei's counsel didn't have an immediate answer, but promised to check.In the United States, the court would have requested the views of the Solicitor General of the United States ("CVSG"). [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 9:38 am
State v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:36 am
Last month, the military commission for the matter of United States v. [read post]
