Search for: "United States v. Place"
Results 8221 - 8240
of 24,128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2010, 7:49 pm
Federalism by Jury in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:37 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 12:39 pm
On March 6, 2012, Timberridge Presbyterian Church of Atlanta filed a petition for certiorari (review) in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:59 am
[v] The court also considered Delaware’s strong interest in providing a forum for disputes regarding the internal affairs of LLCs formed under its laws. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 7:35 am
, United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 5:39 am
Kendrick v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 8:36 am
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/10/07/0635669c2.pdf United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 2:26 pm
” A recent Ninth Circuit case, Garcia v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 1:57 am
United States, 362 U.S. 217, 226 (1960); United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 3:56 pm
Earlier this month a United Kingdom court took their turn on stage in the world-wide Apple v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:41 am
The following contribution to our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” As earlier noted, all positions in the classified service are in the competitive class unless placed in a different jurisdictional class by statute or by the civil service commission having jurisdiction [see §§41, 42 and 43 of the Civil Service Law].[23]Consistent with Article V, §6, of State Constitution, competitive examinations are used to establish eligibility for permanent appointment to positions in the competitive class. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” As earlier noted, all positions in the classified service are in the competitive class unless placed in a different jurisdictional class by statute or by the civil service commission having jurisdiction [see §§41, 42 and 43 of the Civil Service Law].[23]Consistent with Article V, §6, of State Constitution, competitive examinations are used to establish eligibility for permanent appointment to positions in the competitive class. [read post]
14 May 2009, 4:50 pm
In Does Technology Have to Trump Privacy Right,Nicole Black previously discussed the recently decided NY case of People v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 11:49 am
" The ruling had a big impact on debates over takings law (both in the United States and around the world), and generated a massive political reaction. [read post]
9 May 2014, 2:42 am
Second, the court held that claims asserted by U.S. investors who purchased UBS stock on a foreign exchange (“foreign-squared claims”) were barred even though the orders were placed from the United States. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 5:48 am
The judge also found that there was no evidence to show that Wang did not understand English and therefore did not understand the rights as administered to him since, among other things, he “maintained a Facebook page on which he wrote comments in English and he attended college in the United States. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 12:56 am
This sense of responsibility was exemplary, and I hope the United States District Court for the Northern District of California--sort of my other "home court"--will protect judges, court staff, counsel, parties, and a press pool member at a comparably high level when the Epic Games v. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 3:02 am
The United States will be represented by Deputy Solicitor General Greg Garre. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 7:03 am
A grand jury is separate from the courts, which do not preside over its functioning.The United States is virtually the only country that retains grand juries. . . . [read post]
