Search for: "W. D." Results 8221 - 8240 of 13,768
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2012, 2:08 am by Eva Rosenberg
[Note: If you were subscribed to the e-mailed TaxQuips, you’d be getting other exciting news and tips by e-mail, that never appear on the site. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 1:01 am by Rechtsanwalt
Die vorherige Instanz gab ihr 2010 Recht: Wohnräume müssten geschwärzt werden und der Eingangsbereich dürfe gar nicht erst gefilmt werden. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:54 am by Marty Lederman
As Judge Reinhardt explained, that's only the beginning of the analysis:Proposition 8, like Amendment 2, enacts a “‘[d]iscrimination[ ] of an unusual character,’" which requires “‘careful consideration to determine whether [it] [is] obnoxious to the’“ Constitution. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 5:37 am by Lyrissa Lidsky
Consider, for instance, a new law proposed just last month by New York State Senator Jeff Klein (D- Bronx) and Congressman Bill Scarborough. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 3:27 am by John L. Welch
Refusals of HOMIE and HOMIES for athletic bags and backpacks, as being confusingly similar to the registered mark HOMIES & Design for t-shirts and hats.In re Matthew W. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 11:00 am
The Board summarily affirmed the anticipation rejection with little explanation: [W]e adopt the Examiner’s findings as our own. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:40 am by Robert Kraft
The Medicare prescription drug provision is designed to gradually phase out a gap in coverage for pharmaceuticals that was included in the Part D program when it was created under President George W. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 10:01 am
  You can force Windows Explorer to present the folder view the way *you’d* like to see it. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 8:47 am by Joseph D. Kearney
Underwood Professor of Law Emeritus and Professor of History Emeritus, Vanderbilt University Thomas W. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
(d) Statements in decisions of the BoA in respect of appeals filed since 1 May 2003, which appear to be contrary to this conclusion were either obiter dicta and/or were taken without reference to the RPBA (points [36-37] below). [2.3] Where a new argument which constitutes an amendment to a party’s case is put forward for the first time at OPs, how is the exercise of the BoA’s general discretion to admit the amendment affected if the party prejudiced is not present at the OPs,… [read post]