Search for: "Young v. Young" Results 8221 - 8240 of 12,487
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2012, 11:29 am by Jim Gerl
  In the last installment, I discussed the seminal decision of TK & SK ex rel LK v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:45 am by AstuteLegalVideos.com
” [v] Interview on a Colombian television network In 2007, on the program ‘Hablando claro con la prensa’ of a Colombian television network, Yair Klein said in an interview that he did not regret his actions in the country. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 4:43 am by Anita Davies
Ruling in favour of the firm in Simcoe v Jacuzzi UK Group Neuberger said that “something is out of kilter” when the firm had managed to amass costs of £75,000 when its client, plumber Adrian Simcoe, had received a £12,500 settlement for a personal injury claim. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 10:07 am by AstuteLegalVideos.com
[v] “According to a 2007 interview Klein gave on Colombian TV, his infant firm made $2 million from that deal alone. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
”  For the young people here, no matter your political affiliation, I can tell you that involvement in a presidential campaign was exciting — not for the chance to personally interact with the candidate or help develop his positions on issues; the best experiences were canvassing door to door with my kids in northwest Des Moines and northeast Philadelphia; personally observing the Iowa caucus take place in a high school cafeteria; and passing out leaflets at the train… [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 5:49 am by Mark Methenitis
In 2005, the Supreme Court considered inducement liability for copyright infringement in MGM v Grokster. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 3:22 am by Russ Bensing
A case of good lawyering was shown by the 8th’s decision a couple of weeks back in State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:58 pm by INFORRM
  Thus, for example, in Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe SPRL ([2007] 1 AC 359) Baroness Hale argued that the public have a right to know only if there is “a real public interest in communicating and receiving the information. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 1:30 pm by WIMS
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia today for review of EPA's final Utility MACT rule, in National Mining Association v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:30 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit decided the case of United States of America, Appellant, v. [read post]