Search for: "AMP, INC. v. United States" Results 8241 - 8260 of 11,017
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2010, 3:42 am by Sean Wajert
Id. at 806-07; see also United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Mfg., Energy, Allied Indus. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 9:14 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Sexton and Landstar Ranger, Inc., No. 3:09cv950 (M.D.Pa. 2010 Munley, J.), Judge James M. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 1:18 pm by David J. Clark
(“Aon”) brought suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against Marsh USA Inc., Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am by Steven Peck
COLA stated that the matter would be referred to COLA's Contract Fiscal Compliance Unit for a determination. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
United States (Gray on Claims) CAFC: Orion v Hyundai on novelty: Expanding the scope of a printed publication with oral testimony (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: False marking includes marking with expired patent number: ZOJO Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 3:55 pm
BennettHeld: On an appeal from the Secretary of the US Department of Agriculture (“USDA”), the United States District Court for the District of Maryland denied Petitioner’s request to remand the case to a California State court for a number of reasons (including, but not limited to, res judicata and lack of authority) and granted Respondent’s motion for summary judgment because there was no genuine issue of material fact since the Petitioner made… [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:21 am by Eugene Volokh
Greenmoss Builders, Inc., 472 U.S. 749, 784 (1985); Dun & Bradstreet involved state tort law). [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am by law shucks
Desmarais is also registered to practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
30 May 2010, 3:55 pm by Anna Christensen
Kellogg, Brown & Root Service, Inc., and Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2010, 2:08 pm by INFORRM
In Trkulja v Google Inc LLC & Anor [2010] VSC 226 (27 May 2010) the plaintiff complained about photographic images and captions produced as a result of searches on the “Google Image” service. [read post]
27 May 2010, 3:23 pm by Tom Fisher
On May 26, 2010, the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in Deere & Co. v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 5:41 pm
United States, 265 F.3d 1371, 1375 (Fed. [read post]
26 May 2010, 3:33 pm by Thornhill Law Firm, APLC
It mirrors the “reprehensibility” factor described by the United States Supreme Court in BMW of North American, Inc. v. [read post]