Search for: "BES v. State"
Results 8241 - 8260
of 68,871
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2019, 6:18 pm
(“Payments IP”), an Australian company, allegedly contracted with B52 Media, LLC (“B52”), a Maryland limited liability company, and Maryland resident Lonnie Borck (“Borck”), B52’s owner (Borck and B52 being referred to collectively, as the “B52 Parties”), to purchase a web domain (the “Domain”). [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 4:57 am
In both R v Soneju [2005] UKHL 49 and R v Knights [2005] UKHL 50, the House of Lords was concerned with a breach of the then applicable six-month time limit for making a confiscation order. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 6:45 am
The Court of Appeal notably steered clear of adopting such a rigid approach in 10x Genomics v Nanostring. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 11:36 pm
The third simply stated, ” Hey Trish, I notice your mailbox has been left unlocked for quite a while? [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 11:05 am
See Patterson v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:27 pm
Kennedy wrote Romer v Evans (striking down a ballot measure broadly banning gay civil rights protections); Lawrence v Texas (striking down a criminal ban on consensual sodomy); United States v Windsor (striking down the federal Defense of Marriage Act); and Obergefell v Hodges (striking down bans on same sex marriage). [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 10:50 pm
State v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:46 pm
This was said to infringe the act of state doctrine, as explained in decisions such as that of the United States Supreme Court in Underhill v Hernandez 168 US 250 (1897) and the House of Lords in Buttes Gas and Oil Co v Hammer [1982] AC 888. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 3:05 am
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Gamble v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 7:25 am
" Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 4:08 pm
However, in Secure Axcess, LLC v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:39 am
§ 41713(b)(1)) that “prohibits states from enforcing any law ‘relating to rates, routes, or services’ of any air carrier,” Morales v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 8:22 am
“Section 230 establishes a liability rule for litigation in U.S. courts rather than a conduct rule that applies to actions taken outside the United States…This case is being litigated in the United States, so applying Section 230 as a defense to liability involves a domestic application of Section 230, even if the actions that might otherwise create liability occurred elsewhere. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 5:23 am
The Colorado Supreme Court site has this item on one of its pages: People v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
Giving the lead majority judgment Lord Hughes stated that questioning and search under compulsion undoubtedly constitutes an interference with art 8(1). [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 1:15 pm
Look at Hood's press release from when the settlement with State Farm was announced in January 2007, the settlement where he agreed not to prosecute the insurer:"After months of heated negotiations, I am happy to announce that our office has reached a settlement agreement with State Farm in our state court litigation,” said Attorney General Jim Hood. [read post]
19 May 2015, 10:19 am
On April 29, the United States Supreme Court heard arguments in Obergefell v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Such penalties as:Terminating an employee for being absent without proper authority and failing to document his absence, where the employee involved had an exemplary employment record and had suffered a stroke while visiting relatives in Egypt. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 9:33 am
On Monday, the United States Supreme Court issued a summary disposition reversing the judgment of the Alabama Supreme Court in V.L. v. [read post]
