Search for: "Centers v. State"
Results 8241 - 8260
of 22,005
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2010, 11:53 pm
” In the case Deaconess Medical Center v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 8:53 am
” At the Appellate Practice Blog of the International Municipal Lawyers Association, Lisa Soronen discusses the amicus brief that the State and Local Legal Center filed in next Term’s Kingsley v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 10:50 am
The following contribution to our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 2:50 pm
Call of the Docket for September 18: Center Partners, Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 8:32 am
The Court has now docketed District of Columbia v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 3:03 pm
The dissent seemingly discounts this evidence in the record by stating that the only credible evidence shows that CL and JV were hit within seconds after Maher pulled over. [read post]
7 May 2009, 9:25 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 8:48 am
Jensen v. [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 2:02 pm
Meneses v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 3:06 am
Yesterday the Court heard oral argument in Brumfield v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 4:04 am
V. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 2:04 pm
How Bad Has Kreiner v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 5:49 am
Volkman, supra (quoting State v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:07 am
For example, the federal program of public grants to presidential candidates, if they abide by spending limits, is not an attempt to equalize the competition for the presidency, while Arizona’s program and similar programs in other states have that specific goal at their center. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 5:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:33 am
Illinois State Bar Association Mutual Insurance Co. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 6:52 am
On February 23, 2010, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Hertz v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 7:31 am
Justice Breyer’s dissent referenced three amicus briefs, filed by Americans for Campaign Reform, the Campaign Legal Center, and the Democratic Members of the United States House of Representatives. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:54 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
