Search for: "Companies A, B, and C"
Results 8241 - 8260
of 12,883
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2009, 1:49 am
Astral proposes three things: a) copyright reform, to offer a speedier clearance process for getting professional Canadian content online; b) limiting tax deductions for advertising in foreign new media; c) the establishment of a federal new media tax credit to support content creation. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 10:02 am
Brenner also discussed Section 20(b) of the Exchange Act, a rarely used provision that prohibits any person from performing an unlawful act “through or by means of any other person. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 6:05 am
Identifying Your Employer and Use of Company Name or Company Logo Once you identify yourself as an employee of the company, what you publish will be associated with the company. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 6:05 am
Identifying Your Employer and Use of Company Name or Company Logo Once you identify yourself as an employee of the company, what you publish will be associated with the company. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 5:16 pm
The SEC Anti-Fraud Provisions Section 10(b) (codified in 15 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
W (b) Dissuasiveness The Court noted that the circumvention costs, even if minimal, “may have a dissuasive or deterrent effect”. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 3:58 am
A court would be required to examine: a) the facts of the outbreak in China and its impact on the Chinese factory, b) the contractual relationship between the Chinese factory and the importer and c) the contract between the U.S. importer and the customer. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 1:28 pm
Company managers refused to budge. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 6:17 am
They are defined as Protection Levels A, B, C, or D. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 1:28 pm
Company managers refused to budge. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 11:02 pm
But A's case is not a judgment in C's case; A's remedy is not a remedy for C (see, e.g., Gill v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 8:00 am
” (I take this to be a typo for 56:3–13–2(c).) [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 9:46 am
" William C. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 3:49 am
Which Lotus companies were liable? [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 12:42 pm
The safe harbor is not absolute: Section 2258B(b) disqualifies providers from protection under certain circumstances, such as if the provider engages in intentional misconduct. [read post]
11 Nov 2023, 4:25 am
C. [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 12:30 pm
§ 9-11-26(b), and O.C.G.A. [read post]
24 May 2007, 8:27 am
The Management Company duly sends me notice of the exceedence (Section 2.06(b)) but I do nothing about it because I am not obligated to do anything about it. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 2:42 pm
B. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:14 am
’s work about how it’s the surprise that causes people to hesitate—there’s no connection w/ a particular brand, so the response that we see when people confront supposedly diluting marks is not the brand-specific mechanism that we thought that it was.Many claims made in the reading were (perhaps unsurprisingly) persuasive to me, but striking how little empirical basis there is for so many of them: For example, The Constructive Role of Confusion in Trademark, Alfred… [read post]
