Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 8241 - 8260
of 48,941
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2020, 3:18 am
The Court found that the receivers were under an obligation only to pay for the discharge operation and, in connection with that obligation, to meet the cost of appointing stevedores. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Wilde v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 2:55 pm
“Notice-and-Takedown” Provision In order to avoid the uncertainty and cost of litigation (which would have bankrupted every online platform and deprived the public of important opportunities to speak and connect), Congress enacted Section 512, which provides a “safe harbor” for various Internet-related activities. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 12:54 pm
The case is entitled Podolak et al. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 11:24 am
In August 2018, the trial judgment of the first case concerning fan fiction was rendered in Cha v Yang et al. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 10:09 am
On July 30, 2020, the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Alameda County Deputy Sheriff’s Assn. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:17 am
The conventional view is that trademark law exists to prevent consumer confusion and lower consumers' search costs for finding the products they want. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 7:41 am
But it comes at a cost. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 4:40 pm
The case – Inserso Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 4:31 pm
See United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 12:36 pm
., v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 9:12 am
Under the California Supreme Court’s decision in Morillion v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 7:59 am
Co. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 6:09 am
First, same-sex couples would face tangible harm in the form of increased search costs, which can be decisive on the margins. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 6:01 am
Two companies withdrew their pending registration statements last week, including low-cost airline operator Frontier Group Holdings. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 5:49 am
Smith v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 2:00 am
Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) wide discretion under the ACA to define the covered preventive care services and create exemptions (Little Sisters of the Poor v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Citing the 1971 decision in Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 6:19 am
Bloche v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 4:22 am
In this connection, he briefly discussed the case, 3M company v KM Brothers, involving the sale of N95 masks on Amazon at costs exceeding 3M’s list prices. [read post]
