Search for: "House v. State"
Results 8241 - 8260
of 25,472
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2020, 4:37 am
Analysis of June Medical Services v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 3:59 pm
" The court then ruled that "all proceeds" traceable drug trafficking are subject to forfeiture, even if they are increased due to a windfall.The People of the State of Illinois v. $35,315 United States Currency, 2016 IL App (4th) 150685. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
Sabra v. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 9:12 am
Jerry Brown recently signed SB 292 into law, which holds that plaintiffs need not prove that sexually harassing conduct, as defined in the state's Fair Employment Housing Act, was motivated by sexual desire. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 5:53 am
Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 8:13 am
The Court of Appeals disagrees.The case is Jewish People for the Betterment of Westhampton Beach v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:36 pm
The United States Supreme Court in the case of Roper v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:21 am
Garraway is in the care, custody and control of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, housed in its facility in Malone, New York. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 10:44 am
The document doesn't state any reasons: 15-11-19 CAFC Denial of Samsung v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 5:30 am
Television Series, Preemption of Implied In Fact Contract To Sell an Idea, Pitching an Idea, Choice of Law, Conflicts of Law Forest Park Pictures v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 9:03 pm
White House assistant press secretary Kevin Munoz announced that, starting November 8, 2021, the United States will allow fully vaccinated individuals entry into the country, reducing the restrictions on international visitors intended to prevent transmission of COVID-19. [read post]
The court must consider the national security and public safety threats posed by concealable weapons
30 Oct 2021, 12:26 pm
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
21 Jul 2007, 8:18 am
State v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:26 pm
He noted that s.118, was as follows: (1) A secure tenant has the right to buy, that is to say, in the circumstances and subject to the conditions and exceptions stated in the following provisions of this Part - … (b) if the landlord does not own the freehold, or if the dwelling-house is a flat (whether or not the landlord owns the freehold), to be granted a lease of the dwelling-house. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:26 pm
He noted that s.118, was as follows: (1) A secure tenant has the right to buy, that is to say, in the circumstances and subject to the conditions and exceptions stated in the following provisions of this Part - … (b) if the landlord does not own the freehold, or if the dwelling-house is a flat (whether or not the landlord owns the freehold), to be granted a lease of the dwelling-house. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 6:42 am
Quoting United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:56 am
” Briefly: In the Sacramento Bee, Wen Fa and Ralph Kasarda weigh in on Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:55 pm
Div. 2006) (stating “a parent cannot bargain away a child’s right to support because the right to support belongs to the child, not the parent”); Patetta v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 9:21 am
State * Latest Example of Social Networking Site Evidence Contradicting In-Court Testimony--People v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 7:00 am
Construction Employees v. [read post]