Search for: "Line v. People" Results 8241 - 8260 of 13,534
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2013, 5:09 am by Terry Hart
” The soul of a new machine: Gawker struggles with the slippery slope between viral and true — “If you tell the truth, people might not share it. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 10:15 am by Brendan Kevenides
 But the bottom line is that if the injuries were due to a condition then the plaintiff would have to prove that "the City had notice of the condition that posed an unreasonable risk of harm." [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am by Larry Catá Backer
Ames, 188 U.S. 321 (1903) (Commerce power extended to prohibiting commerce in certain goods, in this case shipping Paraguayan lottery tickets across state lines);  Swift and Company v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 1:57 pm by Stephen Gottlieb
Indeed, there is no logical reason to draw the line there and many don’t. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 3:24 am
 First time round, they did a very good imitation of trade mark bullies when they took on a shop with the logo-line "The Monte Carlo Traditional Fish and Chips" in County Monaghan, Ireland (see T.M.R. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 5:09 am by Susan Brenner
I found my lil-bear in my backyard when she was just a baby and ive raised her . . . she's so spoiled and thinks shes a people, lol. . . . now its your turn, lol. [read post]
5 Oct 2013, 5:08 pm
By motion, the People move under CPL Sec. 240.20(2)(b)(v) to compel the Defendant to submit to the taking of oral swab samples from his body for DNA testing and analysis. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 12:29 pm by Dan Markel
Let's stipulate for purposes of argument that at least in some cases, confinement or boxing is required for particular people, rather than monitoring. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 11:10 am by Bruce Boyden
First, take Google’s reliance on the 1973 case of United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 11:10 am by Bruce E. Boyden
First, take Google’s reliance on the 1973 case of United States v. [read post]