Search for: "Mark Case"
Results 8241 - 8260
of 70,954
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2017, 4:48 am
Coverage of the nomination comes from Mark Matthews and others in the Denver Post; Richard Wolf of USA Today; Mark Sherman at the Associated Press; Mark Walsh at Education Week’s School Law Blog, who looks at Gorsuch’s record in education cases; Philip Rucker in The Washington Post and Jeff Mason and Steve Holland of Reuters, who focus on how the White House kept the nomination secret; S.A. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
Now one step below the Supreme Court, this case also likely marks the first time that warrantless use of stingrays has reached any federal appellate court. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 8:17 am
Case date: 11 May 2021 Case number: No. 19-1077 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 7:29 am
Mark Bennett earlier published his arguments why the AG had no authority to request rehearing, and it turns out the State Prosecuting Attorney agrees. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 8:49 am
Solo Cup: Question of intent necessary for false marking charges. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 9:42 pm
A comparison of the marks as they appeared on shirts is below. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 6:07 pm
They argued that CGS's use of the sign CIPRIANI in relation to its restaurant was a classic case of 'double identity' infringement of same mark, same services. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 8:00 am
The details of the oral argument are as follows: Each side is allotted 30 minutes for argument Defendant may reserve up to 10 of his 30 minutes for rebuttal Demonstrative aids may be used at oral argument only if both of the following prerequisites are satisfied: (1) the exhibit is a duplicate, enlargement, photograph, or computer-generated representation of an exhibit that is already part of the motion record; and (2) notice that the aid will be… [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 8:46 am
In most cases the sentence is at least five years, and often it is 10, 15, or 20 years or more, even for nonviolent first time offenders. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:47 am
“For example, the strength of the mark and the similarity between the marks often work in reverse for cases of parody and satire as compared to a standard infringement case. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 9:01 pm
"Finally, as to the third element, the Board observed that under the case law materiality may be established by showing that the place named in the mark is "famous as a source of the goods at issue," that the goods are a "principal product" of the place, that the place is "noted for" or "renowned for" such goods, or that the goods are the "traditional" products of the place named. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 1:28 am
Instead she had to rely on use analogous to trademark use.Opposer argued that analogous use may be relied upon for priority only by an opposer seeking to prevent someone from registering a mark, but the case law indicated otherwise. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 10:00 am
Fisher maintained that the mark is merely descriptive of the goods, and the Board agreed. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 6:28 am
A good criminal defense lawyer will make that evaluation early in the case . [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 11:10 am
Every great trial lawyer will tell you that the key to success in litigation is finding the story in a case. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 10:24 am
The Tennis Channel, represented by attorneys from Covington & Burling, has won a case against Comcast, marking the first time an independent programming network has won a discrimination case against a cable or satellite company. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 2:55 am
”Applicant submitted third-party registrations for MUSTARD CAFE, KETCHUP, HONEY, CITRUS, and FIG & OLIVE, all for restaurant or related services, but the Board poo-pooed that evidence, since the Board must decide each case on its unique facts and the record before it.Furthermore, we do not find any of the marks applicant references analogous to LEMONADE. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 2:45 am
Two incidents of confusion involving Applicant's MySpace profile also bolstered Opposer's case. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 5:00 am
Perhaps.Seriously, though, compare this case to the Board's recent MINK decision (blogged here) in which that mark was found to be both deceptive under Section 2(a) and deceptively misdescriptive under Section 2(e)(1). [read post]
19 May 2013, 11:14 am
Image of Mark Twain and quote from http://www.twainquotes.com/Speculation.htmlSteven Kalar, Federal Public Defender N.D. [read post]
