Search for: "Peter v. Peter"
Results 8241 - 8260
of 8,635
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm
LooperLegal Usage: A Modern Style Guide (2018) by Peter ButtLegal Writing: A Judge’s Perspective on the Science and Rhetoric of the Written Word (2020) by Ho [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 1:02 pm
As Bob Ambrogi reports, on February 19, 2013, Massachusetts Superior Court Justice Peter Lauriat held a hearing in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 2:37 pm
CTRL-C and CTRL-V are considered sacred symbols. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 1:09 am
The memo take great pains to emphasize that while the case was pending, the Second Circuit entered its opinion in Fait v. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 1:05 pm
Michael Carroll (co-author Peter Jaszi), Campbell at 30: A Retrospective Appreciation Part of a series based on the history of fair use. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 10:52 am
This from Sandrine Giroud, Partner at LALIVE in Geneva:I am proud to announce that the Geneva Bar Association includes as of today the role of lawyers in the protection of human rights in its Professional Code of Conduct in accordance with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. [read post]
4 May 2022, 5:01 am
THE MODERN ALTERNATIVE The House of Representatives recently asked the Justice Department to prosecute Peter Navarro and Dan Scavino for the statutory crime of contempt of Congress. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
[We're moving this up, because we've received an updated version of the program. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:13 am
The latest decisions from our nation’s courts, including the Massachusetts Supreme Court “Ibanez” decision, Kemp v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 5:15 am
(Your Secrets Are Safe Here) - http://bit.ly/rgPGAS (Ralph Losey) When You Know, You Know: Cache La Poudre Feeds LLC v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 5:10 am
The New York Times, December 5, 2009 Saturday, Late Edition - Final, Section A; Column 0; Metropolitan Desk; Pg. 15, 876 words, Mayor v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 4:00 am
Justice Michel Bastarache, of the Supreme Court of Canada, criticized that court for the 2004 decisions in the Monsanto Canada Inc. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:07 am
Toronto : Emond Montgomery Publications, 2010 v, 157 p. ; 28 cm. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 2:33 am
En Allemagne, par exemple, le ministère de la justice a décidé que tout prestataire de services de courrier électronique doit vérifier l'identité de ses clients avant de leur ouvrir un compte - interdisant ainsi en pratique tout usage anonyme du courriel.La directive sur la conservation des données a fait… [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 4:00 am
Décision Même si la sévérité d’une peine prise isolément ne soulève pas une question de droit, cette question constitue en l’espèce un élément intégral et essentiel de l’analyse constitutionnelle. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 5:19 pm
In Matter of Lynda D v Stacy C, it was held that the information before the court enables it to undertake a comprehensive independent review' of a custody or visitation issue, an evidentiary hearing is not required. [read post]
27 May 2007, 10:11 pm
Peter Collier writes: “Memorial Day ain't what it used to be. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:12 am
The following is our monthly featured post from Terry Nelson & Peter Fetzer of Foley & Lardner filling you in on the latest SEC developments. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 5:46 am
http://t.co/hwHBatI (Mathew Nelson) Providing eDiscovery Clients With Value – http://bit.ly/qBm8RG (Hubbard & Jenkins) Raising the eDiscovery Stakes for Unprepared Litigants – http://t.co/UU3DUNd (Chris Dale) Recreational Hacking: Second Horseman of the Tech Apocalypse – http://t.co/kkBIqEx (Douglas Wood) Star Trek Meets eDiscovery: Episode Five – Captain Kirk Learns About Sedona Principle Two - http://tinyurl.com/3oeuuqe (Ralph Losey) Server Virtualization Without A SAN… [read post]
26 May 2024, 7:49 pm
In this respect, it is generally admitted that borderline should be that the enforcing court should refrain from reviewing the determination of facts and application of law made by the foreign court “as if it were an appellate tribunal reviewing how the “lower court” decided the case” (Peter Hay, Advance Introduction to Private International Law and Procedure (Edward Elgar, 2018) 121). [read post]
