Search for: "Petite v. United States" Results 8241 - 8260 of 13,105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2007, 7:10 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), his counsel should have raised a Sixth Amendment challenge to the sentencing enhancements, even though Nichols was sentenced in 2002, more than two years before the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:39 am by John Elwood
United States, 11-8737, and Gibbs v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:50 am by Adam Chandler
United States and Barber v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 8:22 am
United States, a prosecutor's office has an affirmative obligation to maintain a record-keeping system ensuring that all lawyers in the office have access to information about promises to witnesses. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:39 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  Almost three-quarters of the legislatures in the United States passed new capital sentencing laws after Furman, and they all had to figure out what that badly fractured decision meant. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:43 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  Panel decisions in favor of criminal defendants are now sometimes corrected en banc, rather than going up to the Supreme Court to add to the Ninth's notorious reversal rate.One such decision was a fairly standard case on premeditation, United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2022, 10:53 pm by Florian Mueller
Avanci et al., United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, case no. 20-11032: April 20, 2022 "Brief of Amici Curiae ACT | The App Association, Computer and Communication[s] Industry Association, High Tech Inventor[s] Alliance, and Public Interest Patent Law Institute in support of petition for interference en banc" (I haven't mentioned Perkins Coie before, but I know and respect former as well as current Perkins partners)Google v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:04 pm by cdw
” [via LexisOne] FAVORABLE TO THE PROSECUTION OR EXECUTIONER United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 1:55 pm by AALRR
AT& T Mobility LLC., the United States District Court for the Northern District of California agreed with the conclusion of the court in Quevedo v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 3:26 pm by David Ettinger
On May 1, 2, and 3, the court will hear the following cases (with the issues presented as stated on the court’s website): United Teachers of Los Angeles v. [read post]