Search for: "STATE v FIELD" Results 8241 - 8260 of 12,942
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2012, 2:03 pm by Abhinav Chandrachud
(5) Examine the impact of the judgment in Natco v Bayer and its significance for developing countries in the field of compulsory licensing.The committee also organizes the Belles-Lettres J.E. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 10:06 pm by Ilya Somin
In addition, if Amar is right that “Any law, state or federal, heaping disabilities or dishonor upon any citizen by dint of his or her birth status — because he was born black, or because she was born female or out of wedlock — violates a core principle of the Fourteenth Amendment’s opening sentence,” then laws denying the vote to women were banned by the Fourteenth Amendment, and there was no need for the Nineteenth Amendment (which finally banned sex… [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:47 am by Susan Brenner
They opened the car door, retrieved the suspected narcotics, and conducted a field test, which was positive for cocaine. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:58 am by Rob Robinson
LA Fitness International: Shifting Costs to Seek Fairness in Discovery – Reed Smith – http://bit.ly/NejzAg (Patricia Antezana) Warrantless Phone Search Deemed Unconstitutional; Destroys State’s Murder Case – http://bit.ly/P5BXJW (IT-Lex) We Produced Privileged Documents; Now What? [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  (Expression v. traditional advertising may have something to do with the differences here—NFU is problematic perhaps because it spans both types of uses, whereas Rogers is for expression that isn’t standard advertising.) [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 5:30 am by Susan Cartier Liebel
Steven holds six patents in the field of content authentication, is the founder and CEO of a content authentication provider. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 10:05 pm
In People v Lopez, an undercover narcotics officer approached defendant and who were standing outside a building located 420 feet from a public school in Bronx County. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 12:15 pm by Veronika Gaertner
Its general rule, Article 4 (1), points to the law of the state in which the damage occured, i.e. either the state of the investors’ home or that of their bank accounts. [read post]