Search for: "State v. FIELDS" Results 8241 - 8260 of 12,938
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2019, 9:41 am
In my view, this interpretation of Article 3(a) would accord with the object of the SPC Regulation, which is to encourage invention in the field of medicinal products by compensating inventors for the delay in exploiting their inventions due to the need to obtain regulatory approval, and not to confer unjustified monopolies. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 6:18 am by Neoshia Roemer
In light of highly destructive recent court decisions like Shelby County v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 10:40 am by Dan E. Stigall
Army Field Manual 3-24, Counterinsurgency, states, “Long-term success in [counterinsurgency] depends on the people taking charge of their own affairs and consenting to the government’s rule. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 7:56 am
Randy E, Barnett (Georgetown) is first and begins by discussing Gonzales v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:59 am by Bexis
  All this in a state – Illinois – where the highest court forbids FDCA-based common-law causes of action (see Martin v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Xavier Beauchamp-Tremblay
This summer, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in the Google Inc. v. [read post]