Search for: "State v. Law"
Results 8241 - 8260
of 173,909
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2023, 9:41 am
The prohibition of abuse of economic dependence is not provided for under EU law, but was introduced in several member states including Belgium. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 9:41 am
From Hakim v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 8:58 am
True, Jackson opposed the bank on policy grounds, but he also denied that the Supreme Court decision in McCulloch v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 8:55 am
This is significant in two broad sets of cases: those that rely on history to apply a constitutional rule (as lower courts are doing with the historical-analogical test prescribed by New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 8:23 am
And then, in 2017, the famous hiQ Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 7:37 am
John’s Law Review will be hosting a symposium on West Virginia v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 7:37 am
John’s Law Review will be hosting a symposium on West Virginia v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:35 am
Miller v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division opined that contrary to the Employee's contention, the record before the hearing officer contained substantial evidence to sustain the findings of misconduct and, citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d at 1046, and, contrary to the Employee's assertion, noted that "hearsay statements ... were admissible" in a Civil Service Law §75 administrative disciplinary action. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
Examples include: Evidence of the original meaning of the Contracts Clause and ways it might be reinvigorated through litigation Potential theories under the Citizenship Clause State constitutional anti‐monopoly and anti‐gift provisions and other causes of action unique to state law or state constitutions The Ninth Amendment Questions left open by North Carolina Dental Board and ways in which parties can use the Sherman Act to… [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division opined that contrary to the Employee's contention, the record before the hearing officer contained substantial evidence to sustain the findings of misconduct and, citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d at 1046, and, contrary to the Employee's assertion, noted that "hearsay statements ... were admissible" in a Civil Service Law §75 administrative disciplinary action. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
For some policymakers, the repeal of Roe v. [read post]
How Jack Smith May Charge Trump PAC with Fraudulent Fundraising Within the Bounds of First Amendment
24 Aug 2023, 5:55 am
” United States v. [read post]
Examinations Under Oath – Insurer Requests Have to Be Reasonable and Made Before the Claim Is Denied
24 Aug 2023, 5:54 am
Co. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 5:33 am
Injured workers whose deposition is scheduled should be informed by their counsel that a deposition is a fact-finding legal proceeding and the law requires them to always tell the truth. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 4:05 am
In Planned Parenthood South Atlantic v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
Hans states that these exceptions, for example, allow law enforcement to pursue charges against platforms that host child sexual abuse material. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm
For some policymakers, the repeal of Roe v. [read post]
D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: selective prosecution under § 1983, January 6 sentencings, and more.
23 Aug 2023, 7:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: selective prosecution under § 1983, January 6 sentencings, and more.
23 Aug 2023, 7:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
