Search for: "State v. Self" Results 8241 - 8260 of 15,624
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Moreover, the well established rule in New York is that constitutional provisions are presumptively self-executing (see Brown v State of New York, 89 NY2d 172, 186 [1996]). [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 4:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
" United States v Yancey, 621 F3d 681, 684-85 (7th Cir. 2010). [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 1:13 pm by Sandy Levinson
  Interestingly enough, Aldrich doesn’t cite any of Dahl’s work, including his 2002  book How Democratic Is the United States Constitution? [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
(Heller v District of Columbia ["Heller II"], 698 F Supp 2d 179 [D DC 2010]; Ezell v City of Chicago, — F Supp 2d —, 2010 WL 3998104 [ND Ill 2010]).4 Page 4 Penal Law §§ 265.01 and 400.005 Penal Law § 265.01(1) states, in relevant part, that a "person is guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree when: (1) [h]e possesses any firearm. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 10:07 am by Native American Rights Fund
Hobia (Indian Gaming; Tribal Lands) * State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2015state.htmlMiccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 9:30 pm by Deborah C. Malamud
 For example, in discussing Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 11:33 am by Stephen Bilkis
2011 NY Slip Op 21015 The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 10:23 am by Root User
This is Shari’s last week at EFF, as she is moving with her family out of state. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 7:11 am
 Under this framework of analysis, the Court finds the letter of intent to be enforcable due to the mutual assent of the parties, and the lease is not enforceable.Following this line of reasoning, the Court noted that due to the absence of ambiguous terms in the letter of intent the trial judge need not entertain extrinsic evidence, especially if the evidence were to be of a self-serving nature, as in the present case.The full opinion is available in PDF. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
Tucker served as lead counsel in both Glucksberg v Washington and Quill v NY, which raised federal constitutional claims seeking to establish the right; both cases were heard by the Supreme Court of the United States in the mid-1990s. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:56 pm by Michelle Gyves
The EU Commissioner for Justice, Consumers and Gender Equality, Věra Jourová, stated in January that the EU had indicated to the US that reforms must include “sufficient guarantees on national security access” and that the EU had “recently registered concrete engagement from the US on this issue. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 7:58 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Suffer No Tyranny How State-Tribal Relations Might Evolve in the Light of the Supreme Court’s Michigan v. [read post]