Search for: "United States v. Herring" Results 8241 - 8260 of 23,703
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2023, 12:56 pm by Jeff Welty
The Fourth Circuit considered the intersection of open carry and Terry in United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 3:41 pm by Eugene Volokh
Accordingly, we need not address any issues regarding the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution.] [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
United States: The case will resolve a circuit split over what a defendant must do to preserve an appellate challenge to the length of his/her sentence and if simply arguing for a lower one will suffice. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 2:40 pm by Eugene Volokh
Here is a summary of the plaintiff's allegations, from Judge Liam O'Grady's opinion denying a motion to dismiss: Plaintiff is a retired Senior Master Sergeant in the United States Air Force ("SMSgt. [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 12:14 pm
An alternative permissible qualified funding asset is obligations of the United States government. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 6:41 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Her dissent drew deeply from originalist theory and sources similar to Justice Scalia’s majority opinion in D.C. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 10:14 am by Ria Tabacco Mar
The Court would be more representative of the composition and interests of the population of the United States if a qualified woman were appointed. [read post]
24 May 2008, 3:03 am
Rogers wrote (p. 8), referring to a 1995 report, "only the United States prints bills that are identical in size and color in all denominations. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:55 am
  The ITC complaint procedure is a favorite tactic by parties because in a relatively short amount of time, usually in a year or less, the ITC can issue exclusion orders which prohibit infringing products from entering the United States. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 10:23 am by Alex Vitrak
It hurts children that are citizens of the United States – who are terrified to live in their own country. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
United Kingdom, the workplace surveillance was predicated upon suspicions of criminal activity, and in Copland v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 8:31 pm by Anthony Zaller
” Therefore, Viking petitioned the United States Supreme Court to review the case, arguing that Iskanian is preempted by federal law and the U.S. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 10:20 am by Sital Kalantry
  The United States, on the other hand, is correct not tolerate human rights abuses in the United States even if it would be permissible in the home country of the diplomat. [read post]