Search for: "United States v. Washington" Results 8241 - 8260 of 10,170
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2019, 1:10 pm by Mark Walsh
United States, a challenge brought by young people against the federal government’s handling of climate change going back to … well, the Space Age. [read post]
26 May 2010, 11:15 am by Erin Miller
  This opinion followed up on his view from Washington v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 7:35 am
As Judge Weinstein notes: Those who would limit the powers historically exercised by juries must now consider the Supreme Court’s Booker-Apprendi line of sentencing decisions, see United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 11:39 am by Nicholas Totin
Elite colleges and universities in the United States have been historically reserved for wealthy, predominantly white Americans. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 8:57 pm by Bill Marler
FDA and our partners at CDC identified 28 foodborne illness outbreaks of Shiga-toxin producing E. coli (STEC) with a confirmed or suspected link to leafy greens in the United States between 2009 and 2017. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:58 am by madeo-design
Bush appointed her to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
United States A federal judge dismissed the $250 million defamation lawsuit filed by high school student Nicholas Sandmann against The Washington Post. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
” At National Review, Rachel Bovard argues that “[i]f Google prevails” in Google v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:37 am by Conor McEvily
Hopwood notes that Paul Clement’s use of the phrase “unprecedented and unbounded” in his brief for the ACA challengers echoes a phrase used by the Chief Justice in the Court’s opinion in United Haulers Association, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Not only does the Solicitor General represent the interests of the United States government before the Court, but the office is also charged with assisting the Supreme Court in the exercise of its judicial function. . . . [read post]