Search for: "York v York"
Results 8241 - 8260
of 51,489
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Citing Trump v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 7:26 pm
New York, Clapper, and . . . the Fourth Amendment? [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 4:14 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Brnovich v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 3:45 pm
The 1977 decision Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 8:48 am
~~Foy v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 8:48 am
~~Foy v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 6:48 am
Supreme Court oral argument in United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 6:20 am
That's the rule in Anderson v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
Trump v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
The words “family violence”, “domestic violence”, “intimate partner violence” and “coercive control” do not appear anywhere in the Federation of Law Societies of Canada Model Code of Professional Conduct. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Supreme Court granted the New York City Fire Department's [NYFD] motion to dismiss Plaintiff's CPLR Article 78 petition challenging NYFD's decision disqualifying him for appointment the position of firefighter for medical reasons. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 7:11 pm
By Tejpreet (Tanya) Sambi The Ontario Superior Court of Justice has recently recognized a new tort in Caplan v. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 10:10 am
See Collier v. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 9:33 am
In Iacovacci v. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 9:33 am
In Iacovacci v. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 9:33 am
In Iacovacci v. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 7:10 am
Ferncliff Cemetery Association, Inc. v Town of Greenburgh, 2021 WL 31948 (2nd Cir CA 2/1/2021) [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 4:15 am
” The petition was granted in January and additional amici have recently weighed in, including the New York Intellectual Property Law Association (NYIPLA). [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 4:15 am
” The petition was granted in January and additional amici have recently weighed in, including the New York Intellectual Property Law Association (NYIPLA). [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees before the completion of their required probationary period as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for… [read post]
