Search for: "Billings v. United States"
Results 8261 - 8280
of 10,162
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
The $4 million civil penalty will be divided among the United States, Alabama and Iowa. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 8:59 am
Critics of the bill may find some solace in a recent ruling in Crossen v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:25 am
-Conn (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): All threats, no action…: Best Buy Co Inc and another v Worldwide Sales Corporation Espana SL (IPKat) United States US General California’s Trade Secret disclosure statute doesn’t apply in Federal Court – or maybe it does (IP ADR Blog) US Patents USPTO wants to change restriction practice (Patent Baristas) The post-Bilski landscape: Why some tried, but failed, to ban ‘business method’… [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 9:00 pm
Because he has abdicated such prosecution decisions to Attorney General Holder and United States Attorneys (which is doubtful)? [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 10:13 pm
For example, an Arizona jury awarded a homeowner and his family more than $4 million for a case where the insurance carrier delayed remediating mold contamination (Hatley v. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 9:35 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 2:11 am
Reynolds and Jameel – the existing law Before examining the proposals in Lord Lester’s Defamation Bill it is perhaps worth summarising shortly the existing state of the Reynolds common law defence. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:00 am
§ 20-1-119 applies to claims against the State); Allen v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 6:32 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 12:44 pm
As Judge Levin pointed in Morefield v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 9:17 am
” Lastly, this law comes at a time when the United States is exerting pressure on her allies to refrain from adopting similar “protect the children” Internet prohibitions. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 7:48 am
Judge Deborah Chasanow of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland refused to grant a motion to dismiss, filed under Maryland's anti-SLAPP law, a libel suit brought against his company by individuals and entities who were criticized in an article published on the ML-Implode blog. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 6:30 am
(The case is EPIC, et al. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:41 pm
United States, 149 U.S. 698 (1893). [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 7:07 am
In Kidwell v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 2:48 pm
The third case is Maqaleh v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 8:09 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 12:02 pm
In a very recent decision by the United States Supreme Court, in Berghuis v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 12:02 pm
In a very recent decision by the United States Supreme Court, in Berghuis v. [read post]
