Search for: "California v. Law" Results 8261 - 8280 of 33,836
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2014, 1:01 pm by GSU Law Student
  Further, there is question of whether California vs. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Reva Siegel (Yale University - Law School) & Mary Ziegler (University of California, Davis - School of Law) have posted Abortion's New Criminalization-A History-And-Tradition Right to Healthcare Access After Dobbs and the 2023 Term on SSRN. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 6:41 am by Bradley McAllister
The San Diego policy required law-abiding gun owners to demonstrate good cause in order to obtain... [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 5:13 am by Susan Brenner
Toy and Wren also relied on the California Court of Appeals' decision in People v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 10:47 am by Christopher J. Walker
Slocum (Southern California Law Review forthcoming) The Neglected Value of Effective Government by Richard H. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 8:10 am by Matt C. Bailey
The opinion, which upheld a trial court’s denial of certification of meal and rest period claims, does not add much to the mix in terms of new law, and appears to simply mirror the issues presently before the California Supreme Court in Brinker. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 12:15 am
Yesterday, I discussed the confused characterization of the defendant in Carbon Crest, LLC v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 8:36 pm by Michael Atkins
That’s what the Ninth Circuit found the Central District of California did in the ConsumerInfo.com, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 11:00 am
The California Prevailing Wage Law mandates the payment of prevailing wages to workers employed in the execution of a contract for public works. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 6:51 am by pfriedman
Schwarzenegger, the case in which the constitutionality of California’s Proposition 8, overturning the state’s gay marriage law, is being challenged. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 4:35 am by Edith Roberts
Becerra, a First Amendment challenge by crisis-pregnancy centers to a California law that requires disclosures about the availability of publicly funded family-planning services, including contraception and abortion, arguing that “[a]mong its many problems, the lower court’s definition of ‘professional speech’ is dangerously overbroad. [read post]