Search for: "Companies A, B, and C" Results 8261 - 8280 of 12,883
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2012, 2:25 am by V.D.RAO
It is known that section 399 of the Companies Act, 1956 entitles minority shareholders, subject to the qualification prescribed, to approach the Company Law Board (CLB) under section 397/398 of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking relief against the ‘oppression and mis-management’ from the majority shareholders in the Company. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 1:09 pm by Kevin LaCroix
 Under section 172 of the UK Companies Act, directors are under an obligation to promote the success of the company having regard to the following specific factors: (a) the likely consequences of any decision in the long term (b) the interests of the company’s employees (c) the need to foster the company’s business relationships with suppliers, customers and others (d) the impact of the company’s… [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:33 am
Finally, Premium Aircraft Interiors - a company in the Contour Group - appealed a decision from the UK Intellectual Property Office (IPO) following the dismissal in August 2011 of their application to remove the UK as a designation of the 908 patent under Rule 50 of the Patents Rules 2007 (subject of a separate post). [read post]
1 May 2018, 1:02 pm by Timothy Kim
In January 2005, Plaintiff Charles Lee entered into a written independent contractor agreement with Dynamex to provide delivery services for the company. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:58 pm by Timothy Kim
In January 2005, Plaintiff Charles Lee entered into a written independent contractor agreement with Dynamex to provide delivery services for the company. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:58 pm by Timothy Kim
In January 2005, Plaintiff Charles Lee entered into a written independent contractor agreement with Dynamex to provide delivery services for the company. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm by Daphne Keller
Or an image used in a car advertisement and that same image used to criticize the car company. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 3:25 am by Peter Mahler
Anyone investing in a new business needs to (a) perform a comprehensive trademark search for other possible users of the business’s proposed name, and (b) secure registration and ownership of the proposed mark in the new company’s name. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 12:29 am
  (b) Would an expedition interfere with the good administration of justice? [read post]
1 May 2018, 9:00 am by Michael H Cohen
As a matter of fact, labeling errors may result in FDA enforcement action which could tarnish your company’s reputation and business. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:02 am by Ernie Svenson
Here are a few examples of popular songs featuring this progression: “Don’t Stop Believin‘” by Journey (E, B, C#m, A) “With or Without You” by U2 (D, A, Bm, G) “Sweet Home Alabama” by Lynyrd Skynyrd (D, C, G) “Where Is the Love? [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:51 am by Nietzer
If there are compliance issues that your company faces, then the target probably faces them as well. b. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 12:00 am by Jordan Bierkos
Alberta,[2]Builders’ Lien Act, RSA 2000, c B-7; as of July 1, 2021, Alberta’s Builders’ Lien Act has been replaced by the Prompt Payment and Construction Lien Act, Chapter P-26.4 (the … Continue reading Saskatchewan[3]Builders’ Lien Act, SS 1984-85-86, c B-7.1 (the “Saskatchewan Act”). and Ontario.[4]Construction Act, RSO 1990, c C 30 (the “Ontario Act”). [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
Intitulé : Directrice des poursuites criminelles et pénales c. [read post]
After conducting his own online research into the state corporate records, he learned of a second company, All Star Investments, [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 7:15 am by Barry Sookman
At the extremes, trade secrets have been used to make sure that skilled labour is never allowed to work again for any other company, or to start another business. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
The last time I wrote on the subject (read here) I noted that, unlike some other states, New York's LLC Law has no express provision authorizing or prohibiting member expulsion, although LLCL Section 701(b) mentions member expulsion in the context of various events (death, retirement, bankruptcy, etc.) [read post]