Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 8261 - 8280
of 9,553
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2019, 2:00 am
Looking Ahead So, what does the future have in store for freelance workers? [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:41 am
Per the Court: “The mere possibility that a project may change as it moves through the planning process does not preclude applying CEQA’s requirements at the early stages of project review. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 4:47 am
In Illinois, we are fortunate to have a department of health that does a great job documenting nursing home violations and publishing them on a quarterly basis. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 11:07 am
" It will allow mere 1% stockholders to put director candidates into corporate proxy materials, at the company's expense. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:15 pm
Respondents argued that the ‘614 patent was rendered obvious by (1) the ‘740 patent in view of U.S. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 1:19 pm
My blog for @CenDemTech about why this is v. worrisome. https://www.cdt.org/blogs/gs-hans/0611overbroad-subpoena-airbnb-user-data-smacks-general-warrant … “Does the U.S. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 2:41 pm
The Act also provides for inspections to ensure compliance (FCTTA, s.3(1)). [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 2:22 pm
June 20, 2024) ruled unlawful and invalidated the portion of this rule that provides that HIPAA obligations are triggered in “circumstances where an online technology connects (1) an individual’s IP address with (2) a visit to a[n] [unauthenticated public webpage] addressing specific health conditions or healthcare providers. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 12:54 pm
Step 1: Was the Procurement Legally Flawed? [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 8:40 am
Greg Lambert 1:31 Yeah. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 11:07 am
Ray Patterson claimed that the “statutory right of fair use” is often ignored.1 Professor Lawrence Lessig laments that “[y]ou either pay a lawyer to defend your fair use rights or pay a lawyer to track down permissions so you don’t have to rely upon fair use rights. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 4:13 am
They say that bad facts make bad law, and that was proven yet again earlier this year with Righthaven’s resounding defeat on the standing issue in the Ninth Circuit.1 I have uploaded a copy of the Ninth Circuit’s opinion to Scribd. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 5:29 am
This does not mean that other consequences do not come along with consumption tax policy decisions. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:20 pm
"(1) The Section 2 Report reflects a significant effort by my predecessors and the FTC in collecting and evaluating the opinions and expertise of antitrust enforcement officials from the United States and abroad, leading economists and legal scholars, antitrust practitioners, and representatives of the business community. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 8:29 am
What does that mean in plain English? [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm
For example, Stanford hosted a July 2007 Pirate Party cash-preferred political fundraiser for anonymous donors that also had stops at the Googleplex[1] and the O’Reilly conference. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 10:29 pm
" 35. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 5:59 am
Asbestos exposure is hazardous, especially as the incidence rate of mesothelioma does not go down once exposure has stopped. [read post]
6 May 2021, 3:02 am
Greg Lambert 1:14 I did. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 1:55 am
Finally, a policy that protects the domestic tax base with simple rules does not fit with exempting foreign business activity from domestic taxation. [read post]
