Search for: "English v. English" Results 8261 - 8280 of 11,204
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2019, 1:09 am by INFORRM
  The factors a Data Controller in Google’s position are required to consider were considered and discussed by the English High Court in NT1 & NT2 v Google LLC [2018] EWHC 799 (QB) (see our blog here). [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 7:25 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Lastly, the majority ruled both retaliation claims failed because the plaintiffs did not demonstrate that the allegedly adverse employment actions were causally related to any protected conduct (Abril-Rivera v Johnson, July 30, 2015, Lynch, S; to be reported at 99 EPD ¶45,357). [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 10:56 am by Robert Yablon
Though the question presented was quite narrow and technical, the split in Artis v. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
For analysis of how the focalisation criterion raises issues for online content published in English, see Karyn Harty, Audrey Byrne and Lesley Caplin’s piece for McCann FitzGerald here. [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
Cecilia Sbrolli re-imagines the decision in the case Fuller v. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 10:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Older English cases may be interesting for common law history but that’s not necessarily what Art. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Joint Equity Committee of Investors of Real Estate Partners, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Four people described as “sports stars” have become the latest celebrities to be named in American publications despite having injunctions in English courts. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 9:16 am
The '074 patent does not define the term "channel map information," nor does this term appear to have any ordinary English meaning. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:30 am by INFORRM
The Bookseller reported that the “trade bodies” welcomed the Bill – referring to the Publishers’ Association, the Society of Authors and English PEN. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
The ability of English courts to excise trivial claims from the daily court lists has been given legislative punch with the enactment of section 1 of the Defamation Act 2013, which requires plaintiffs to surmount the “serious harm” threshold in order to establish liability. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:18 am
  The immunity for witnesses in judicial proceedings from liability for damages related to their testimony originated in English common law.See Briscoe v. [read post]