Search for: "FIRST MERIT" Results 8261 - 8280 of 32,706
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
The court also added four cases to its merits docket for next term and asked for the views of the solicitor general in one case. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
The court also issued orders from last week’s conference, adding one case to its merits docket for next year: Van Buren v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 7:03 am by Alex Phipps
The Court of Appeals found no merit in (1)-(2), but vacated and remanded for resentencing regarding (3). [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 11:41 pm
The letter must identify the U.S. and PCT application numbers and whether a first action on the merits for the U.S. application was/will be available no later than 26 months from the U.S. filing date for Case 1 above or from the filing date of the PCT application for Case 2 above. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 2:31 pm
  A couple patent attorneys have reported to me that they have received First Office Actions on the Merits anywhere from 4 to 6 months after filing, and one attorney pointed me to a business method patent application filed by Lehman Brothers on November 26, 2006,... [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 1:58 am by Kevin LaCroix
Co., a 2007 First Circuit opinion applying Maine law, which said that the rule against extrinsic evidence “cannot be rigidly applied in the context of claims-made policies where the determinative event is the timing of the claim, a fact that likely will be …irrelevant to the merits of the underlying tort suit and therefore absent from the pleadings. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 8:59 am by John Lewis, Benjamin Seel, Nitin Shah
On the merits, the court held that Cuccinelli’s appointment as acting director of USCIS was unlawful but did not address whether, in general, a first assistant must be appointed before a vacancy to fill it on an acting basis. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 4:02 am by jonathanturley
Below is my column in the Messenger on the recent opinion finding that the Biden Administration is violating the First Amendment through a massive censorship operation. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 6:10 pm by Aimee Brown
Circuit Review – Reviewed: Old Questions and New Pipelines appeared first on Yale Journal on Regulation. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 1:38 pm by Ken Klukowski
Many in the media are getting this case wrong, saying that the justices failed to decide it because they did not reach the merits of the lawsuit. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 11:12 am by Tess Bridgeman
First and foremost, Congress itself has supported sunsets by enacting them into law in roughly one-third of past AUMFs and declarations of war. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 5:21 am by Frank O'Donnell, Clean Air Watch
Perhaps his most outrageous comment, as reported September 14 by Politico Pro: “There was no political overriding of the science; in fact, this was a judgment on the merits, it was not a political judgment. [read post]
This is because the Supreme Court did not opine on the merits of the defendants’ grounds for removal. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:23 pm by Michael J.Z. Mannheimer
I won't comment upon the merits of the issue currently before the en banc First Circuit, which involves the interesting intersection of the IAD and the All Writs Act, in part because I consulted with some of the amici in the case on their brief. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 11:00 am by Kedar Bhatia
The first panel, the summary, is simply a snapshot of the Term and neatly displays the current state of the Court’s docket. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 2:04 pm by Robert Chesney
  As to the merits, our original posts speak for themselves, though a few additional words are in order for the sake of clarity. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 12:12 pm
First, the decision to grant is just decision to hear a case, not a merits opinion. [read post]