Search for: "First Holding Corporation" Results 8261 - 8280 of 18,747
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2017, 12:01 pm by Nathan D. Taylor and Adam Fleisher
(The Rule does not require that an individual actually hold the title CISO, but rather that an identified individual be designated responsible for the program.) [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 6:43 am by Jordan Brunner
Monday, April 10th at 12:30pm: The Council on Foreign Relations will hold a session on U.S. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 6:41 am
’ BDO Seidman, 337 F.3d 802 at 808 (citing In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 274 F.3d 563, 570 (1st Cir. 2001)).Preib first states that the Court should permit him to intervene because his motion was timely and that he merely seeks a ruling on a previously filed motion. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 3:25 am by Peter Mahler
First, the court held that under Kentucky law, a shareholder of a close corporation as such owes no fiduciary duty to the other shareholders (Griffin was neither an officer nor director of the corporation). [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 5:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Say-On-Pay: First, listed companies in the EU will be required to hold two say-on-pay votes: a prospective binding shareholder vote on director pay, and a retrospective advisory vote on the company’s compensation report (in other words, to approve pay plans in advance and to assess retrospectively how the plans worked out). [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 7:00 am by Ronald R. Krebs
As a result, presidents’ claims to authority hold less sway today. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 2:14 pm by Jim Martin
Mundin uses form books as an aid in drafting documents and pleadings; he goes to the clerk’s office to check on public records, something which can now be done online; he has a friend who works at a major law firm call the firm’s library to locate information about where a corporation is holding a stockholders’ meeting. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
As this is the first go, we’ve doubled down and looked at the past 12 months. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 12:36 pm by John Rubin
The decisions hold that doing business in a state and having a registered agent there does not necessarily obligate a corporation to produce records located outside the state. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 10:45 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
As to the first issue, the Court found that while PJI admitted that it reimbursed the drivers it employs at corporate-owned stores by paying them a specific amount per delivery (without conceding that the rate is so low as to violate the FLSA), Plaintiffs failed to offer any evidence that PJI was involved in its franchisees’ policies for reimbursing delivery drivers. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Jesner v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 1:55 am
AmeriKat Annsley refers to the report written by Martin O’Connor (Addisons) on the recent case of Upaid Systems Ltd v Telstra Corporation Limited (No 4) [2016] FCA 1514 where the Federal Court of Australia recently grappled with the issue. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:31 pm by Tim Hewson
The first thing they have to do is gather up your assets, at which time they will look after them for you. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 9:15 am by Amy Howe
Although the law was rarely used in its first two centuries, in recent decades victims of human rights violations have tried to rely on it to hold both individuals and corporations liable. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 5:39 am by Ganesh Sitaraman
This also holds true when it comes to preventing the next global financial crisis. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 11:52 am
From both germinal events one hears the same cry, a cry out for something, some reaction, some effort to ensure that each event would be the last of its kind—the way political elites sought to cabin war after the First World War, what had then been sometimes nicknamed “the war to end all wars. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:08 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Karasik Seyfarth Synopsis:  In a first-of-its kind ruling, an employer recently secured the dismissal with prejudice of what is believed to be one of the first Telephone Consumer Protection Act class actions ever brought against a company while acting as an employer – specifically in this instance, the use of robo-calls to contact applicants about employment opportunities. [read post]