Search for: "Gooding v. United States" Results 8261 - 8280 of 21,084
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2012, 12:10 am by Administrator
In other words, the case deals with the fate of all copies that the U.S. copyright owner made, or licensed to be made, and which happened to have been made anywhere other than in the United States. [read post]
26 May 2011, 6:54 am by Gabe Johnson-Karp
  Perhaps the most notable advocate of such a system in the United States was Justice William O. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 5:30 am
As per the conceptual comparison, the Court endorsed the Board of Appeal’s findings that the word ‘elma’ is an unusual female first name and is also the name of four small towns in the United States [which, for what it’s worth, a Greek consumer would have never thought], and that the word ‘elmex’ is devoid of any meaning. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 1:36 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Had the Marshalls read these two documents together, they would have discovered that BP was not conducting good-faith continuous operations. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 6:54 am by Joy Waltemath
The court further concluded that the Act was tantamount to regulation because it was broad in scope and did not reflect the state’s interest in efficient procurement of goods or services. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 9:16 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Contents include:Michael Sheng-ti Gau, The Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf as a Mechanism to Prevent Encroachment upon the AreaChristine Gray, President Obama's 2010 United States National Security Strategy and International Law on the Use of ForceWei Shen, The Good, the Bad or the Ugly? [read post]
9 May 2014, 3:50 am by Broc Romanek
The SUM prospectus’ third paragraph consists of the following sentence: “The dearness of labour and the want of Capital are the two great objections to the success of manufactures in the United States. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 10:59 am by Kish Law
 As a respected Senior Judge in New York wrote in the opening lines of his decision in United States v. [read post]