Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE"
Results 8261 - 8280
of 42,245
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2017, 7:03 am
” The field representative also reported the matter to human resources after other attempts to resolve the matter failed. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 1:18 pm
As if it matters. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 12:52 am
Finally, essential and important entities will, as a rule, be deemed to be under the jurisdiction of the Member State where they provide their services. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
The Supreme Court gave several judgments on First Amendment matters last term, and these are helpfully rounded up by the ABA Journal here. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 8:13 am
Why articulate (or rule on) such meaningless challenges. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 12:11 am
IPEC rules are aimed at simplifying the court procedure as much as possible. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:41 am
” With regard to product claims, the court ruled that there is no evidence that Neora is currently making claims that their products cure, treat, or prevent human disease. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:01 pm
If, on the other hand, it is doubtful whether that information is incorrectly defined, then a correction is ruled out (points [2] and [3] of the reasons).[3] The opinion G 3/89 of the EBA, supra, held furthermore that any correction under R 88 EPC 1973 (corresponding to R 139) is of a strict declaratory nature and thus has not to infringe the prohibition of extension of subject-matter under A 123(2) (see Headnote 2). [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 2:08 pm
Although there is a difference of opinion as to what was meant by the request, there is no evidence of any imposition or deception. [read post]
20 May 2015, 1:40 pm
AG Holder recognized that five of the seven Federal Circuits that have ruled on the issue have overturned at least the third prong of the Silva-Trevino analysis which allowed Immigration Judges to go beyond the categorical and modified categorical analyses and use evidence outside the record of conviction. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 4:30 am
As a practical matter, the jury will decide whether they find the defendant credible by a mere preponderance of the evidence, which then will dictate the verdict that the jury returns. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 4:14 pm
There is no evidence that [Defendant] has pursued litigation against [Plaintiff]. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 6:52 am
Because we agree with the superior court that substantial evidence supports the Ketchikan Gateway Borough’s factual determinations and that the Borough’s decision was correct as a matter of law, we AFFIRM the superior court and adopt its decision, which is attached as an appendix. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:56 pm
As I read the cases on the subject of LLC citizenship, the rule is that an LLC's citizenship (unlike a corporation's) turns on the citizenship of each of its members. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 7:44 pm
It aims to resolve the case without a full trial by demonstrating that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that the defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
30 May 2017, 11:43 am
The fact that second-generation immigrants are not assimilating into Western culture makes immigration policy more, not less, of a pressing matter. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 6:37 am
The Labor Department disagreed and filed a motion to set aside the verdict, arguing that the evidence at trial proved as a matter of law that the violations were willful. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 12:44 pm
An attorney from north London will be extradited to the United States to face corruption charges following a ruling today by the High Court in London. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 9:14 pm
He agreed that the Court of Appeals applied the wrong joinder statute, but said that the Supreme Court should have simply remanded the matter for consideration under the proper statute, rather than concluding that the matter was indeed preserved based on the defendant’s motions before the trial court. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 12:51 pm
The lower-court concluded that applying the general rule in this case made sense because there was no showing that the Department was aware of the facts surrounding Taxpayer’s living arrangements at the time he filed his earlier claims. [read post]
