Search for: "STATE v. YOUNGS"
Results 8261 - 8280
of 8,902
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2008, 8:02 pm
In US V. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 7:45 pm
But that is what is happening now in Kennedy v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 10:12 pm
Young v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 5:43 pm
" Here are snippets:Defenders of the court's decision in Kennedy v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 10:46 am
Supreme Court is asked by a state and the federal government to reconsider a case it has just handed down because it missed key evidence.But that is what is happening now in Kennedy v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 10:22 pm
Luis V. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:03 am
Regina( C) v Secretary of State for Justice; [2008] WLR (D) 262 “The introduction of an amendment to the Secure Training Centre Rules to permit physical restraint of young offenders in secure training centres to ensure good order and discipline without prior consultation with the Children's Commissioner was unlawful and engaged art 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedom. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
Separately, the State of Oregon Public Health Division (ODPH) also noted a small cluster of E. coli infections that day. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 3:01 pm
An example of its enforcement is the 1994 Pennsylvania Superior Court case, Savoy v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 6:30 am
Blitt, How to Entrench a De Facto State Church in Russia: A Guide in Progress, (Brigham Young University Law Review, July 21, 2008, Forthcoming).Mark C. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 12:37 pm
District Judge, Nebraska, who cited a legal blog in his opinion in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
United States, 853 F.2d 640, 641-42 (9th Cir. 1988); Young v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 4:25 pm
Earlier coverage of Medellin v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:31 pm
There was a 25 inch TV on a shelf above the door, it was plugged into a spare light socket, and there was a V-Shaped portable-TV ariel on the window ledge. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Haviland, No. 07-3380 Grant of a conditional writ of habeas corpus is affirmed where: 1) petitioner sought to represent himself at trial, and the trial court's failure to rule on his requests to proceed pro se deprived him of his Sixth Amendment right to self-representation; and 2) state courts' objectiv [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 7:26 pm
Supreme Court's ruling last month in Kennedy v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 1:54 pm
Note: The two previous pieces published in The Yale Law Journal Pocket Part this summer are Agency Preemption Inputs in Riegel v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 7:18 am
Link: Detroit Free PressLink: Lansing State Journal [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 3:19 pm
Bolger v. [read post]
