Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 8261 - 8280
of 13,843
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2013, 6:15 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 5:01 am
The United States Senate recently passed a bill, which is now under consideration in the House of Representatives, requiring on-line retailers to collect use tax on behalf of states whose residents are failing to pay the use tax when they make an out-of-state purchase using the internet. [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:01 pm
In particular, the Kentucky case, Kant v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 2:54 pm
However, the European Commission's preliminary assessment is that the license agreement underlying that rate-setting case came into being under anticompetitive circumstances, calling into question whether there even is an enforceable agreement in place.Alternatively to a process in Germany, Google "suggest[ed] the [arbitration] panel [in the United States] employ a 'baseball arbitration' procedure to resolve any areas in which the parties are unable to reach agreement" (emphasis… [read post]
9 May 2013, 11:43 am
The United States District Courts for the Northern and Central Districts of California granted defendants’ motions and dismissed the complaints. [read post]
9 May 2013, 11:17 am
In McDaniel v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 10:51 am
United States v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 10:39 am
Sure, Nazaire is trying to make a point that the decisions of a United States District Judge in one state do not dictate the decisions of a United States District Judge in another state. [read post]
9 May 2013, 5:29 am
Conventional wisdom says that the current iteration of the United States Supreme Court is pro-business. [read post]
9 May 2013, 1:48 am
With the rapid changes in technology and a myriad of regulatory frameworks that may be applicable, employee handbooks may need to be updated much more frequently than ever – especially with respect to the rapidly evolving world of social media: Savvy employers, especially those with multi-state operations, know that employment actions are regulated at the federal, state and even local level. [read post]
9 May 2013, 1:48 am
With the rapid changes in technology and a myriad of regulatory frameworks that may be applicable, employee handbooks may need to be updated much more frequently than ever – especially with respect to the rapidly evolving world of social media: Savvy employers, especially those with multi-state operations, know that employment actions are regulated at the federal, state and even local level. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:32 am
Clarifying the holding in United States v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:28 am
It argues that “U.S. federal court lacks jurisdiction over Megaupload” because it “is a wholly foreign corporation; it is not incorporated in the United States, and it has no agents or offices in the United States. [read post]
6 May 2013, 3:09 pm
For example, recent United States Supreme Court decisions have imposed significant limitations on the ability of public officials and public figures to win defamation actions. [read post]
6 May 2013, 3:05 pm
In Craigslist Inc. v. 3Taps Inc., No. [read post]
6 May 2013, 10:33 am
In 2010, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decided in United States v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 7:44 am
Thus, the state of Maryland did not offend the United States Constitution when it denied counsel to Mr. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:17 am
DIFFUSION AN INTERNATIONAL, INTERDISCIPLINARY CONFERENCE ON COMPARATIVE LAW Co-Sponsored by the Swiss Institute of Comparative Law and Juris Diversitas 3 & 4 June 2013 Lausanne, Switzerland [For additional information, contact Marie Papeil at marie.papeil@isdc-dfjp.unil.ch ] Monday, June 3, 2013 8:30-9:30 Registration, Coffee … [read post]
5 May 2013, 7:40 am
Under the terms of the settlement, the have agreed to pay the United States and the State of California $14.1 million to settle claims that they violated the False Claims Act. [read post]
5 May 2013, 7:12 am
It also held that RLUIPA does not authorize damage claims against officials in their individual capacities.In United States v. [read post]
