Search for: "State v. C. R."
Results 8261 - 8280
of 13,583
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2012, 8:34 am
Lukaszewski and others, R (on the application of Halligen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 20 - read judgement The Supreme Court has ruled that there should be a discretion in exceptional circumstances for judges to extend time for service of appeals against extradition, where the statutory time limits would otherwise operate to prevent an appeal in a manner conflicting with the right of access to an appeal process under Article… [read post]
22 May 2012, 5:14 pm
Legal Found. v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 3:44 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 2:25 pm
R. [read post]
22 May 2012, 12:57 pm
Last September, Judge Rakoff made a major ruling in the Madoff case (Picard v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 10:15 am
Toler v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:04 am
Schenck v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 4:45 am
” Citing Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
22 May 2012, 2:30 am
It is not clear if this is possible, because it is ordinarily accepted public policy in the New York Convention is a reference to the public policy of the enforcing State. [read post]
22 May 2012, 2:00 am
” Therefore, any person that claims such exemption from registration is, by virtue of claiming such exemption, stating that it is operating a “commodity pool” as defined under CEA section 1a(10) and could therefore be considered a financial entity under CEA section 2(h)(7)(C). [read post]
22 May 2012, 2:00 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 9:03 pm
In the wake of the case (.pdf), United States v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:54 pm
In Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629, the Court of Appeal considered whether the application of the bedroom rule in the housing benefit regulations as regards private rented accommodation discriminated against those who needed an extra bedroom for a carer or because their children could not share a room as a result of disability (see here for our discussion of the Upper Tribunal decisions). [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:54 pm
In Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629, the Court of Appeal considered whether the application of the bedroom rule in the housing benefit regulations as regards private rented accommodation discriminated against those who needed an extra bedroom for a carer or because their children could not share a room as a result of disability (see here for our discussion of the Upper Tribunal decisions). [read post]
21 May 2012, 7:19 am
§ 615 (f)(3)(C). [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:42 am
R (Alvi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 24 – 27 April 2012. [read post]
20 May 2012, 6:30 pm
Zito v. [read post]
20 May 2012, 12:46 pm
Zito v. [read post]
19 May 2012, 7:53 am
His post is titled "On the President, his penis, and bizarre attempts to censor a work of art" and is a must-read if you are interested in some of the legalities that will likely be considered including the following considerations: The ANC may not be aware of the fact that section 16(1)(c) of the Constitution states that everyone has the right to freedom of expression, which includes ”freedom of artistic creativity”. [read post]
