Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 8261 - 8280
of 9,094
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2009, 9:05 pm
Now it's poised to determine if youths should face life without a chance of parole.by Lewis BealeMiller-McCuneJuly 7, 2009The Supreme Court's 2005 decision in Roper v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 3:31 pm
[pdf] View Electronic Briefs in Tex. 2009 No. 06-1071 STATE FARM LLOYDS v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 6:54 pm
That judicial suspicion may have been a factor in the court's conclusion that it had jurisdiction over this dispute in the first place. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 12:36 am
For the liberal justices, I would call Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 11:37 am
So then after the FDIC denies your appeal, you can sue the them in United States District Court, either: (1) in the district where the failed bank had its principal place of business or (2) in Washington, DC.Small Claim Pay-OutsRemember at the beginning when I mentioned that your repudiation damages claim probably won't get you much from the FDIC. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 8:50 am
What Ricci v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 2:21 am
Thinking about yesterday's decision in Melendez-Diaz led me to think about last week's decision in District Attorney's Office for Third Judicial Dist. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 2:47 pm
Blue, New York State Supreme Court Criminal Branch Law Library, First Judicial District, New York, New York [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 9:18 am
Blue, New York State Supreme Court Criminal Branch Law Library, First Judicial District, New York, New York
[read post]
25 Jun 2009, 5:18 am
The district court agreed with plaintiff and awarded her $189,000 in attorney fees, id. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 9:05 pm
Brown v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 4:29 am
This has been the uninterrupted doctrine of the Supreme Court since the 1833 ruling in Barron v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 11:20 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 4:09 am
The defendant had successfully obtained an injunction in the District Court, halting the pending state criminal proceedings on the grounds that his prosecution violated his Constitutional rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 4:09 am
The defendant had successfully obtained an injunction in the District Court, halting the pending state criminal proceedings on the grounds that his prosecution violated his Constitutional rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 1:10 pm
Today, one such decision was handed down from on high -- the case known as Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 12:52 pm
That case, Cassidas Municipal Water District v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 7:53 am
Because Congress is presumed to be aware of, and to adopt, a judicial interpretation of a statute when it reenacts that law without change, Lorillard v. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 12:22 pm
The district court agreed with the government's view, but the Fifth Circuit reversed. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 10:04 pm
Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit issued an order denying rehearing en banc in United States v. [read post]
