Search for: "United States v. May" Results 8261 - 8280 of 47,744
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2022, 3:20 am
§ 1746, the following language may be used for unsworn declarations executed outside the United States: "I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 7:45 am
Part IV: Institutional Architecture of Law and Governance: The Law of Government of the United States then considers the legal rules through which governmental regulatory authority may be exercised. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 10:46 am by Adam Kielich
The state of same sex marriage might be in flux in Texas but federal law, following the Supreme Court decision in 2013’s United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 10:05 am by Christine Swanick and Wilda Wahpepah
  But the court also noted that “it appears nothing prevents the United States from doing so as the Pueblo’s trustee. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 10:05 am by Christine Swanick and Wilda Wahpepah
  But the court also noted that “it appears nothing prevents the United States from doing so as the Pueblo’s trustee. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 9:19 am by Kent Scheidegger
Litigants have had fair notice since at least United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:07 am by Susan Brenner
  The aggrieved party may sue `the person or entity, other than the United States, which engaged in that violation. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 4:02 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Where the release is unambiguous, a court may not look to extrinsic evidence to [*3]determine the parties’ intent” (Burgos v New York Presbyt. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 11:48 pm
The United States Supreme Court in 2003 stated in Smith v Doe that the ex post facto application of these Sex Offender Registration Laws was not Punitive in nature, but civil and regulatory intent. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 7:21 am by Conor McEvily
  For this blog’s Academic round-up, Amanda Frost examines some of the academic commentary on the Fourth Amendment’s applicability to GPS surveillance, an issue the Court will take up in United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 12:00 am
The city of Belmont, California passed an ordinance in November of 2007, which is becoming effective this month; the ordinance prohibits smoking in:(3) Multi-unit residence common areas; except that a landlord or common interest development may designate a portion of the outdoor area a smoking area. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 12:55 am by Lawrence Solum
From the 1866 Civil Rights Act through the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]