Search for: "Cost v. Cost" Results 8281 - 8300 of 48,941
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2015, 10:32 am
That's the headline of a Law360 story here about sanctions imposed by the Z-panel: Judges KoZinski, PaeZ, and BerZon, in Blixseth v. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 3:01 pm by Larry
So, this is the first in what should be a small group of catching-up posts.United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:33 pm by INFORRM
Comment This decision follows others where actions have been struck out as a result of limited publication, see Wallis v Meredith ([2011] EWHC 75 (QB)), Bezant v Rausing [2007] EWHC 1118 (QB): McBride v Body Shop Int Plc [2007] EWHC 1658 (QB) and Noorani v Calver [2009] EWHC 561. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:50 pm by Gaetan Gerville-Reache
The “American rule” that each party pays their own attorney’s fees does not apply in drain code appeals, according to the Court of Appeals’ decision in Arath IV, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 12:30 am
Interestingly, TCL did not appear to raise the Smallest Saleable Patent Practising Unit argument to argue that the value of the SEPs must be lower than the cost of the chip. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 8:26 am by Tom Smith
But after fifty years of an abortion regime which has cost millions of lives, has been unmoored from any medical and scientific advances and immune to changing public opinion, Roe and Casey are beginning to show their cracks. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 5:46 am
Pursuant to the Eighth Circuit’s mandate, late last week, the lender/plaintiff, Rand, was ordered to pay defendants attorney’s fees (Amber Hawkins, John Tancabel) in the amount of $121,142.50 (and costs in the amount of $933.12). [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 7:19 am by Sarah M Donnelly
Link to Journal Entry of Judgment by Default in the matter of Whitebird v. [read post]