Search for: "DOE v. UNITED STATES" Results 8281 - 8300 of 44,322
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2020, 7:49 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The court in Jane Doe v. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 11:07 am by Magdaleen Jooste
Recently, the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS), in the Booking.com decision held that a generic .com domain name can obtain a trademark registration under certain conditions. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 10:46 am by Giles Peaker
Tiemo, R (on the application of) v Lambeth London Borough Council (2020) EWHC 1193 (Admin) A interim judicial review decision from May, but judgment just out. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 9:42 am by Neil Schoenherr
In light of President Donald Trump’s recent attacks on the United States Postal Service, Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act should be revised to prohibit racial discrimination in voting by the federal government, says a Washington University in St. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
Supreme Court’s ruling in Bostock v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 12:31 pm by Josh Blackman, Seth Barrett Tillman
” Section 201(a)(1) defines this category to include members of Congress, as well as “an officer or employee or person acting for or on behalf of the United States. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:28 am by Eugene Volokh
Defense Distributed's efforts were initially met with opposition from the United States Department of State. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 7:56 am by Paul Rosenzweig
This does not mean that an application on the recipient side is impossible—but in current forms it seems likely to have less efficacy. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 6:17 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
When they returned to the United States, they were ordered to quarantine for 21 days, and police officers were deployed outside their apartments to make sure they complied with this directive. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 4:41 am by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
But if you do choose to pre-record yourself nodding and sipping coffee, spend your free time listening to Marlene’s summary of the recent copyright litigation of Thomson Reuters v. [read post]