Search for: "English v. English" Results 8281 - 8300 of 9,871
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2012, 5:36 pm by Mark Graber
Critics could raise problems with English, Hindi, Chinese or French. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 12:00 am
In ENER-G Holdings plc v Hormell, the Court of Appeal (Longmore, LJ dissenting) held that it is. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 8:47 pm by Eugene Volokh
Here’s a very brief summary: In a long line of cases (such as Presbyterian Church in the United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Although this issue was raised in a strike-out/summary judgment hearing in Google v Mosley 2015 EWHC 59 (QB) (see [42] – [48]), which settled before trial, it has not been determined in the English courts. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 12:16 am by Frank Cranmer
Ilyin and Others v Ukraine (no. 74852/14): about the Kyiv City State Administration’s refusal to register a community of the Unification Church. [read post]
The concept is still rather wooly, but the approach remains that of Lord Bingham in M v Secretary of States for Work and Pensions [2006] 2 AC 91, encapsulated by Lady Hale as “the closer the facts come to the protection of the core values of the substantive article, the more likely it is that they fall within its ambit. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 12:39 am by Kluwer IP Reporter
Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg) and C-559/20 (Koch Media GmbH v. [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 4:51 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Goldman opposed the petition with a Hebrew-to-English translated contract denominated a “Deed of Acknowledgment, Undertaking, and Clarification,” but which the parties referred to as a “Side Agreement. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 12:36 am by Kluwer IP Reporter
Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg) and C-559/20 (Koch Media GmbH v. [read post]