Search for: "Good v. Good" Results 8281 - 8300 of 76,231
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2012, 7:22 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  The court held that Disney’s use of these words as film titles and on related goods did not constitute use as a mark, at least in the context of a public domain work. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
(I don't really recommend the wonder bra styling for the office :) Silk & Cashmere V-neck Cardigan Sweater $19.99 (Victoria's Secret) [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
Distinctiveness in that instance was to be assessed through immediacy or first impression test (Case T-130/01 Sykes Enterprises Incorp. v OHIM), that is when “…it is perceived immediately as an indication of the commercial origin of the goods or services in question, so as to enable the relevant public to distinguish, without any possibility of confusion, the goods or services of the owner of the mark from those of a different commercial origin. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
However, I recently re-visited a 1929 case with an intriguing family connection:  Dedman v. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 12:37 pm
“A strict observance of the written law is doubtless one of the high duties of a good citizen, but it is not the highest. [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:34 am
 A little moral suasion is often a good thing. [read post]
17 May 2014, 3:05 am by SHG
  As a member, I’ve had the enormous good fortune to receive John’s Jackson emails, with details, stories and background about  Justice Jackson. [read post]