Search for: "J. A. C." Results 8281 - 8300 of 19,477
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2015, 9:56 pm
Arm Holdings, PLC, 403 F. 3d 1364, 1371 (CA Fed. 2005) (“[C]ommon sense dictates that the trial judge’s view will carry weight” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); Lightning Ballast, supra, at 1294 (Lourie, J., concurring) (we should “rarely” overturn district court’s true subsidiary factfinding; “we should, and do, give proper informal deference to the work of judges of a subordinate tribunal”); Cybor, supra, at 1480… [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 1:02 pm by Danny O'Brien and Nadia Kayyali
En los casi 25 años que la EFF ha estado defendiendo los derechos fundamentales en el entorno digital, nuestra creencia en la promesa de la Internet solo se ha fortalecido. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 10:28 am
You might think that the exemptions always impose an unacceptable cost in social tension, as the baseball-cap-wearers bristle at being treated unequally, even if you don’t think their bristling actually reflects real moral injury. c. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 1:26 am by Marta Requejo
Two recent opinions, the one rendered by AG Wathelet on December 8, 2014, in Gazprom (Case C-536/13), and the other one given by AG Jääskinen, on December 11, 2014, in CDC (Case C-352/13) address the interplay between arbitration and EU law, especially in the context of the Brussels I Regulation. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
The most-consulted French-language decision was Charland c. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 8:09 am
 * An Enterprising Victory, with Arnold J in the driving seatTo what extent can context change the likelihood of confusion? [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 6:30 am by Jim Sedor
Tomassoni Takes Job with Group That Lobbies LegislatureMinneapolis Star Tribune – J. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
(a)  Warby J (b)  Sir Michael Tugendhat (c)  HHJ Richard Parkes QC (d)  Sir David Eady (17) Who was incorrectly described on the Judiciary website as a judge sitting in the Family Division? [read post]