Search for: "JOHN DOES 1 -10"
Results 8281 - 8300
of 9,146
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2008, 11:26 am
Apart from a slightly earlier recording of his "Concord Sonata" by John Kirkpatrick, the most important early recordings were of Three Places in New England, conducted by Walter Hendl, Symphony No. 3, conducted by Richard Bales, and the Piano Sonata No. 1, played by William Masselos. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 7:06 pm
" In other words, of every 50 men who stay on statins for five years, 49 risk an adverse drug reaction with no benefit. [1][www.thelancet.com]xtIs it good medicine to expose children to risks of harm in adults are questioned? [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 11:48 am
If police get credible information that John Doe is going to murder his neighbor on Friday, and if they investigate and find evidence corroborating what they're heard (e.g., Doe has bought a high-powered rifle or poison and he has been telling people his neighbor "won't be around any more"), then they can arrest Doe for attempting to murder his neighbor. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 1:26 pm
The ruling came in response to two John Does' motions to dismiss the complaint, strike the Carlos Linares declaration, and quash the subpoena. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 1:26 pm
What really struck me, as it does every time the Philharmonic delves into this repertory, is what a total master Sousa was of his genre. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 8:09 am
John Doe v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 5:15 am
Petersburg (FL) Times Online, PolitiFact on McCain drilling ad: “FALSE” How many serious geographic/geo-political errors does a candidate get to make before the press decides that it actually means something? [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 11:09 pm
#1- Franklin's tough ordinance is constitutional.#2- Other ordinances in other communities are safely in place.#3- Other municipalities considering adopting such ordinances can safely move forward.#4-Does Hanke have to move? [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 8:49 pm
This week Patent Baristas talked with John LeGuyader, Director of TC 1600 at the U.S. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:00 am
" Examining Attorney Steven Fine argued that the addition of the prefix "bio" to the word "silk" does not "provide a basis for believing that the goods are in fact not made of real silk. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 12:24 am
Thus, Peter Tatchell's attempt to arrest John Bolton for the crime of aggression (a perfect example of how legalism might be used against imperial power) was blunted by this condition. [read post]
Class action counsel must be as diligent reviewing potential conflicts as their defense counterparts
2 Jul 2008, 8:05 pm
"The responsibility of class counsel to absent class members whose control over their attorneys is limited does not permit even the appearance of divided loyalties of counsel. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 10:00 am
"The Board therefore found that Tsubaki's specimen is not a display associated with the goods, and the refusal was affirmed.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 8:38 am
" John C. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 6:43 am
It's simply a matter of common sense and fairness.If hearsay weren't excluded, John Doe could take the stand and say that Jane Doe told him that the defendant - Richard Roe - who's on trial for murder confessed to the whole thing. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 1:49 am
John's University School of Law) has posted The Border Search Exception as Applied to Exit and Export Searches: A Global Conceptualization (Quinnipiac Law Review, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2007) on SSRN. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 4:14 am
District Judge Tena Campbell found that the enforcement of the law against "John Doe" would cause him "irreparable harm" before the court had a chance to review the constitutionality of the state law.The decision deals a small legal blow to the state. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 6:18 pm
Keynote 1: “R U 4 Reel” Dr. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 2:48 pm
" said John Eastman, dean of the Chapman University School of Law in Orange. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 12:18 am
Doe, Morris -v- Prosecutor, Marion County, Indiana (Case: 1:08-cv-0436-DFH-TAB)While it is true that the court noted "Plaintiff's do not challenge the requirements to report e-mail addresses, user names and the like" (p-5), the actual court analysis (pp-38-49) clearly showed that the 4th amendment prohibits the government from requiring things in the home without a warrant. [read post]
