Search for: "John Does, 1-2" Results 8281 - 8300 of 10,076
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2024, 5:35 pm by Ilya Somin
The majority does rely on modern precedent restricting civil liability for the president, such as Nixon v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 5:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”   The June 20, 2017 Opinion On June 20, 2017, in an opinion by Judge Jeffrey Sutton for a 2-1 majority (Judge Bernice Donald dissenting), the Sixth Circuit affirmed the district court’s ruling that the policy’s insured vs. insured opinion precluded coverage for the Liquidation Trustee’s claims against the Reids. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 7:14 am by Neil Kinkopf
These cases afford the Supreme Court an opportunity to address two important separation-of-powers topics: (1) the scope and content of Congress’ powers of oversight and investigation and (2) the scope and content of the president’s immunity from criminal process. [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:32 am by Dan Markel
Melissa Hamilton, Reinvigorating Actus Reus: The Case for Involuntary Actions by Veterans with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder; 2. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 7:00 am by Beyond Intractability
Reading Thomas Kochman’s Black and White Styles in Conflict greatly reinforced that conclusion.1 Kochman did not specifically apply his findings to the mediation process. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Cary Coglianese (University of Pennsylvania Law School) & Jennifer Nash (Harvard University’s John F. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 8:04 am
The six member states of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, Oman, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) have become important trading partners with the U.S. [1] This article additionally focuses on foreign investment in two of the GCC countries, Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates, as well as the issue of Dubai’s request for the delay in repayment of bonds announced on November 25, 2009. [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Their position requires that they be “held to higher standards of integrity and ethical conduct than attorneys or other persons not invested With the public trust”.[89] To ensure that the public does not lose confidence in the judicial system, a delicate balance is required to maintain a degree of judicial insulation from society so that judges remain impartial arbitrators While at the same time allowing them to be active members of the community. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:42 pm by Kathryn Fenderson Scott
In Shankman, the respondent, a partner in a firm, was found guilty of, among many other rule violations, violating rule 4-8.4(c) for (1) failing to disclose to the firm and keeping for himself a bonus from a client, over and above the reduced fee that he caused the firm to accept in the case; (2) failing to inform the firm of an unemployment benefits clients potential whistle blower action, directing that the clients case be closed out, and proceeding to represent the client and… [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
And having to do things to prevent harmful animal incursions doesn't undermine our dignitary interests the same way that having to comply with human criminals' demands does. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 11:14 am
[The Cuban Yoruba community anxiously awaits the revelations which will be transmitted by the Principal Sacerdotes of Ifa who met on 31 December to divine, every 1 January, the Letra del Año. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 8:23 am by John Costello, Mark Montgomery
Does the NCD have the authorities and powers necessary to be effective in the role? [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 9:11 am by Guest Blogger
Once that assumption is in place, then you can ask, what does the sequence of puffs mean (it will only be a sequence rather than something random if that condition is met); but without that assumption in place, the question of meaning does not and cannot arise. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 9:11 am by Guest Blogger
Once that assumption is in place, then you can ask, what does the sequence of puffs mean (it will only be a sequence rather than something random if that condition is met); but without that assumption in place, the question of meaning does not and cannot arise. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 12:21 pm
  Those differences can be reduced (in this case at least) to two fundamental issues: (1) the way that facts are weighed and balanced; (2) the basic assumptions about the role of the investor in the face of norms that must be enforced. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 2:53 pm by Ashby Jones
This, plaintiffs contended, constituted a violation of the antitrust laws, namely Section 7 of the Clayton Act and Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act. [read post]