Search for: "Line v. People"
Results 8281 - 8300
of 13,534
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2013, 4:47 am
In Davis v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 4:47 am
In Davis v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 7:56 pm
V. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:44 pm
” The chemical weapons attack on the Iraqi Kurdistan town of Halabja on March 16, 1988 killed thousands of people and was the worst single chemical attack undertaken by the Saddam regime, not to mention by far the largest use of chemical weapons in an otherwise mostly short list since the end of WWII. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 10:54 am
This decision came after the recent Illinois Supreme Court ruling striking down part of the state's gun law as unconstitutional (People v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 1:57 pm
Lurking through cases that offered heightened scrutiny outside the normal tiered rubric was a lingering fear of the spirit Lochner, in this body Williamson v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 12:59 pm
” • “and ill probly only kill the people i hate? [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 9:55 am
Erickson and Washington v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 1:49 am
Supreme Court in its 1994 decision in O’Melveny & Myers v. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 12:13 pm
I've noticed something: sooner or later born censors inevitably go to the "you have too much time on your hands" line. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 8:58 pm
For instance, the brief points to a 5thCircuit case, Hand v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 12:02 pm
The more recent was Washington v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 9:06 am
“The leading case in this area, R. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 12:16 pm
See Wayte v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 9:50 am
In Nollan v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 9:50 am
In Nollan v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 4:54 am
People can both interpret text and read "between the lines" of opinions in ways that computers, at least for now, cannot. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 4:54 am
A true flat line on the EEG. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:23 pm
Affirming the Third Department’s holding, the Court of Appeals held that “this case is not akin to Guzman where the prospective juror confirmed that a sign language interpreter would allow him to follow the proceedings verbatim,” since in Guay, no alternative accommodations were requested or discussed (People v Guay, 18 NY3d 16, 23 [2011]).Along these lines, the Fourth Department noted that “[i]t is well established that ‘[a] juror who… [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 11:29 am
Bottom line: even if plaintiffs had prevailed, it would have required a long and uncertain road. [read post]
